Dissemination and implementation research in health recommender systems: a systematic scoping review and evidence map (Preprint)

Author:

Sun Yue,Ji Mengmeng,Zhou Jia,Wang Zhiwen

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health recommender systems (HRSs) are information retrieval systems that provide users with relevant items according to the users’ needs, which can motivate and engage users to change their behavior.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this scoping review was to give an overview of the state of the evidence on implementation and the gaps of HRSs and create an evidence map.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and synthesized the results. Six databases were searched to identify HRSs reported in studies from inception to June 1, 2021 followed by forward citation and gray literature searches. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third when necessary. Data extraction was performed by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies were included for data extraction. Recommended items were classified into four major categories: general health promotion, lifestyle, generic health service and other domains. A total of 22 studies have reported the use of hybrid recommendation systems, which are the most commonly used recommender techniques in HRSs. A total of 28 studies reported the user interface of HRSs, and most HRSs work on users’ mobile interfaces, usually through a mobile app. Two categories of HRS evaluations were used, and evaluations of HRSs vary greatly. Half of the studies only evaluated the algorithm with various metrics, whereas only a few studies reported assessments involving users to evaluate HRSs.

CONCLUSIONS

Through this scoping review, nonmedical professionals and policymakers can visualize and better understand HRSs in future studies. HRS has been increasingly used in recent years, but there are many unique challenges associated with HRS. There is a lack of scientific evidence in user-centered evaluation approaches, and some other metric parameters vary in HRSs. Further studies should be proposed pertaining to HRS in other therapeutic areas apart from lifestyle and generic health services.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3