Assessment and improvement of the drug data structuredness from electronic health records to enable secondary usage and ensure semantic interoperability (Preprint)

Author:

Reinecke InesORCID,Siebel Joscha,Fuhrmann Saskia,Fischer Andreas,Sedlmayr Martin,Weidner Jens,Wilhelm Markus,Bathelt Franziska

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digitization offers a multitude of opportunities to gain insights for current diagnostics and therapy from retrospective data. In this context, real-world data and its accessibility are of increasing importance to support unbiased and reliable research on big data. However, routinely collected data are not readily usable for research due to the unstructured nature within healthcare systems and the lack of interoperability between these systems. This challenge is very evident in drug data.

OBJECTIVE

In this research, we present an approach that identifies and increases the structuredness of drug data while ensuring standardization according to ATC.

METHODS

Our approach is based on available drug prescriptions and a drug catalog and consists of four steps. First, we perform an initial analysis of the structuredness of local drug data to define a point of comparison for the effectiveness of the overall approach. Second, we apply three algorithms to unstructured data that translate text into ATC codes based on string comparisons in terms of ingredients and product names, and similarity comparisons based on Levenshtein distance. Third, we validated the results of the three algorithms with expert knowledge based on the 1000 most frequently used prescription texts. Fourth, we performed a final evaluation to determine the increased degree of structuredness.

RESULTS

Initially, 52.3% of the 1,768,153 drug prescriptions were classified as unstructured. With the application of the three algorithms, we were able to increase the degree of structuredness to 85.18% based on the 1000 most frequent medication prescriptions. In this regard, the combination of Algorithm 1, 2, and 3 resulted in a correctness level of 100% (with 57,264 ATC codes identified), Algorithm 1 and 3 of 99.6% (with 152,404 codes identified), and Algorithm 1 and 2 resulted in 95.9% (with 39,472 codes identified).

CONCLUSIONS

As shown in the first analysis steps of our approach, the availability of a product catalog to select from during the documentation process is not sufficient to generate over structured data. Our four-step approach reduces the problems and reliably increases the structuredness automatically. Similarity matching shows promising results, especially for entries with no connection to a product catalog. However, further enhancement of the correctness of such a similarity matching algorithm needs to be investigated in future work.

CLINICALTRIAL

no trial registration The research was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Technical University of Dresden as a retrospective, observational, non-interventional, non-human subject study (SR-EK-521112021).

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3