Use large language models (LLMs) tools for supporting qualitative research: A phenomenological study of Chinese clinical researchers’ experiences and perceptions (Preprint)

Author:

Zuo YanORCID,Jin Yongchao,Hu Xiaolin,Yang Kaixuan,Bai Zhilan,He Jingwen,Zhang Jianjun

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The integration of large language models (LLMs) into qualitative research has shown promise in enhancing analytical depth and efficiency. However, there remains a substantial gap in empirical evidence regarding how clinical researchers, particularly in China, utilize these technologies in real-world settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the firsthand experiences, perceptions, and challenges of Chinese clinical researchers using LLMs in qualitative research, identify significant ethical dilemmas and practical issues, and inform future research, policy-making, and educational initiatives.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study using semi-structured interviews with researchers from two major tertiary hospitals in Southwest China. Ten Participants were interviewed to solicit their experiences and perceptions regarding using various LLM tools in qualitative research. Colaizzi’s analytic method was employed for thematic analysis of the interview transcripts.

RESULTS

The study identified three key themes: (1) LLMs were extensively used across different stages of research, particularly in manuscript writing, data analysis, and interpretation of results; 2) Researchers experience an emotional transition from initial excitement to a more critical appreciation of the strengths and limitations of LLMs, leading to a more rational understanding of AI’s role and application in research; 3) Ethical concerns and the need for skill development in effectively using AI tools are prominent, calling for specialized training.

CONCLUSIONS

LLM tools are pivotal assets in supporting qualitative research among Chinese clinical researchers, offering significant advantages in handling complex data and improving research efficiency. However, the integration of these tools into clinical research practices also raises important ethical questions and necessitates a comprehensive approach to training. Guidelines and educational programs are needed to enhance the ethical and effective use of AI in research to ensure these technologies augment rather than compromise the integrity of scientific research.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3