Unmasking Fraud: A Multimethod Pilot Study on the Problem of Fraudulent Participants in Healthcare Research (Preprint)

Author:

Kumarasamy VithusaORCID,Goodfellow NicoleORCID,Ferron Era MaeORCID,Wright Amy L.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The shift towards online recruitment methods, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has brought to the forefront the growing concern of encountering fraudulent participants in healthcare research. The increasing prevalence of this issue poses a serious threat to the reliability and integrity of research data and subsequent findings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the experiences of healthcare researchers (HCRs) who have encountered fraudulent participants while using online recruitment methods and platforms. The primary objective was to gain insights into how researchers detect and mitigate fraudulent behavior in their work and provide prevention recommendations.

METHODS

A multimethod sequential design was employed for this pilot study, comprising a quantitative arm involving an online survey, followed by a qualitative arm featuring semi-structured interviews. The qualitative description approach framed the qualitative arm of the study. Sample size determination was based on information power and data redundancy, with content analysis used to analyze open-ended survey questions and interview data.

RESULTS

A total of 37 HCRs participated with 13 of them engaging in qualitative interviews. Online platforms such as Facebook, email, Twitter, and online newsletters were the most used methods for recruitment. 84% of fraudulent participation occurred in studies that mentioned incentives in their recruitment communications, with 71% of HCRs offering physical or electronic gift cards as incentives. Researchers identified several indicators of suspicious behavior, including email surges, discrepancies in contact or personal information, geographical inconsistencies, and suspicious responses to survey questions. HCRs emphasized the need for a comprehensive screening protocol that extends beyond eligibility checks and is seamlessly integrated into the study protocol, grant applications, and Research Ethics Board (REB) submissions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study sheds light on the intricate and pervasive problem of fraudulent participation in healthcare research using online recruitment methods. The findings underscore the importance of vigilance and proactivity among HCRs in identifying, preventing, and addressing fraudulent behavior. To effectively tackle this challenge, researchers are encouraged to develop a comprehensive prevention strategy and establish a community of practice, facilitating real-time access to solutions, support, and the promotion of ethical research practices. This collaborative approach will enable researchers to effectively address the issue of fraudulent participation, ensuring the conduct of high-quality and ethically sound research in the digital age.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3