Recent Trends in Telehealth for Substance Use Disorder Services: A Comparison of Utilization Rates During and Following COVID-19 Safety Distancing Recommendations (Preprint)

Author:

Pusnik AdrijanaORCID,Hartzler BryanORCID,Vjorn OliviaORCID,Rutkowski Beth A.ORCID,Chaple MichaelORCID,Becker SaraORCID,Freese ThomasORCID,Nichols MaureenORCID,Molfenter ToddORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 social distancing guidelines resulted in a dramatic transition to telephone and video technologies to deliver substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. Before COVID-19, the question was, “Would telehealth would ever take hold for SUD services?” Now that social distancing guidelines have been lifted, the question is, “Will telehealth remain a commonly used care modality?” The principal purpose of the investigation was to examine the extent to which telehealth use in SUD service settings persisted following the lifting of COVID-19 safety distancing recommendations. Additionally, the study aimed to explore practitioners’ perceptions of telehealth convenience and value after its regular implementation.

OBJECTIVE

Compare and contrast telehealth activity between time intervals: May–August 2020 (during peak COVID-19 safety distancing recommendations) and October–December 2022 (following discontinuation of distancing recommendations), for a) telehealth technologies and services, b) perceived usefulness of telehealth, c) ease of use of telephone- and video-based telehealth services, and d) organizational readiness to use telehealth.

METHODS

An online survey measured the use of telehealth technologies for delivering a specific set of SUD services and explored the perceived readiness to use and satisfaction with telephonic and video services using identical scales of a previously published telehealth utilization study by [1]. Six of 10 Regional Addiction Technology Transfer Centers (ATTCs) distributed the survey in their respective regions, collectively spanning 37 states. Staff member responses from this 2022 cross-sectional survey were compared to staff member responses in the 2020 cross-sectional survey. Staff member responses in 2020 and 2022 were anonymous and comprised two separate samples, so an accurate longitudinal model could not be analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 375 organizations responded to the 2022 survey (vs. 457 in 2020). Baseline organizational characteristics were similar to the 2020 sample. Telephone and video telehealth use remained >50% for screening and assessment, case management, peer recovery support services, and regular outpatient services. Yet, nearly all SUD services delivered by phone and video significantly declined from 2020 to 2022, while perceived usefulness and ease of use of telehealth did not significantly change from 2020 to 2002 for most SUD services.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite lower telephone and video utilization, both video-based and telephonic modalities for telehealth service continue to be perceived positively. Future research may further determine the relative cost and clinical effectiveness of video-based services, and thereby help to address some sources of the noted challenges to implementation by SUD organizations.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3