Challenges of designing an over-the-counter medical device for adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss (Preprint)

Author:

Salwei Megan ElizabethORCID,Anders Shilo,Reale CarrieORCID,Slagle Jason M.,Ricketts Todd,Weinger Matthew B.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Only 15% of the nearly 30 million Americans with hearing loss use hearing aids, partly due to high cost, stigma, and limited access to required prior medical evaluations. Hearing impairment in adults can lead to social isolation and depression and is associated with an increased risk of falls as well as dementia. Given the persistent barriers to hearing aid use, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a final rule to allow over-the-counter hearing aids to be sold directly to adult consumers with perceived mild-to-moderate hearing loss at pharmacies, stores, and online retailers without seeing a physician or licensed hearing health care professional.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the safety and usability of an over-the-counter hearing aid prior to FDA approval and market release.

METHODS

We first conducted a formative usability test of the device and associated App with 5 intended users to identify outstanding safety and usability issues. Following design modifications, we performed a second round with 15 intended users of the device. Participants were asked to complete 2-5 tasks, as if they were using the hearing aid in real life. After each task, participants rated the task difficulty. At the end of each session, participants completed a 10-question knowledge assessment and the system usability scale (SUS) and then participated in debriefing interviews to gather qualitative feedback. All sessions were video recorded and analyzed to identify use errors and design improvement opportunities. We concurrently conducted a test with 21 non-intended users (i.e., users with contraindications to use) to ascertain if consumers could determine when they should not use the device, based on the packaging, instructions, and labeling.

RESULTS

In all three usability tests, usability issues were identified. There were minimal safety-related issues with the device. Round 1 testing led to several design modifications which then increased task success in Round 2 testing. Participants had the most difficulty with the task of pairing the hearing aids to the cellphone. Participants also had difficulty distinguishing the right and left earbuds. Non-intended users did not always understand device contraindications (e.g., tinnitus, severe hearing loss). Overall, test findings informed eight actionable design modifications that improved device usability and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

This study evaluated the usability and safety of an over-the-counter hearing aid for adults with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Human factors engineering methods identified opportunities to improve the safety and usability of this direct-to-consumer medical device for individuals with perceived mild-moderate hearing loss.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3