Machine learning-based prediction model for cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes: Derivation and validation in two independent Korean cohorts (Preprint)

Author:

Sang HyunjiORCID,Lee HojaeORCID,Lee MyeongcheolORCID,Park Jaeyu,Cho WonyoungORCID,Kim SunyoungORCID,Woo Ho GeolORCID,Rahmati MasoudORCID,Koyanagi AiORCID,Smith Lee,Lee SihoonORCID,Hwang You-CheolORCID,Park Tae SunORCID,Lim Hyunjung,Yon Dong KeonORCID,Rhee Sang YoulORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Various machine learning (ML) prediction models have recently been developed for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, the lack of multiple risk factors limits their predictive power.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the validity and usefulness of an ML model for predicting the 3-year incidence of CVD in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

We used data from two independent cohorts, the discovery cohort (one hospital; n=12,809) and the validation cohort (two hospitals; n=2019), to predict CVD. The outcome of interest was the presence/absence of CVD at 3 years. We selected various ML-based models with hyperparameter tuning in the discovery cohort and performed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

The study dataset included 12,809 (discovery) and 2,019 (validation) patients with T2DM recruited between 2008–2022. CVD was observed in 1,238 (10.2%) patients in the discovery cohort. The random forest (RF) model had a mean AUROC of 0.830 (95% confidence interval 0.816–0.845) in the discovery dataset. Applying this result to the extra-validation dataset revealed the best performance among the models, with an AUROC of 0.72 (accuracy of 65.4%, sensitivity of 66.0%, specificity of 65.4%, and balanced accuracy of 65.7%). Creatinine and glycated hemoglobin levels were the most influential factors in the RF model.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the usefulness and feasibility of ML for assessing CVD incidence in patients with T2DM and suggests its potential for use in patient screening. Further international studies are required to validate our findings.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3