The Box: Cost-utility of an eHealth intervention in the outpatient clinic follow-up of acute myocardial infarction patients. (Preprint)

Abstract

Smartphone compatible wearables have been released on the consumers market, enabling remote monitoring. Remote monitoring is often named as a tool to reduce cost of care.

The primary purpose of this paper is to describe a cost-utility analysis of an eHealth intervention compared to regular follow-up in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

In this trial, of which clinical results have been published previously, patients with an AMI were randomized in a 1:1 fashion between an eHealth intervention and regular follow-up. The remote monitoring intervention consisted of a blood pressure monitor, weight scale, electrocardiogram (ECG) device and step counter. Furthermore, two in-office outpatient clinic visits were replaced by e-visits. The control group received regular care. The differences in mean costs and quality of life per patient between both groups during one year follow-up were calculated

Mean costs per patient were €2417±2043 for the intervention, and €2888±2961 for the control group. This yielded cost reduction of €471 per patient. This difference was not statistically significant (95% CI -€275;€1217; P=.216). The average quality adjusted life years (QALY) in the first year of follow was 0.74 for the intervention group and 0.69 for the control (difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.09;-0.01; P=.028).

eHealth in the outpatient clinic setting in patients who suffered from acute myocardial infarction is likely to be cost-effective compared to regular follow-up. Further research should be done to corroborate these findings in other patient populations and different care settings.

Nct02976376

RR2-10.2196/resprot.8038