Linking opinions shared on social media about COVID-19 public health measures to adherence: repeated cross-sectional surveys of Twitter use in Canada (Preprint)

Author:

Denis-Robichaud JoséORCID,Rees Erin E.ORCID,Daley PatrickORCID,Zarowsky ChristinaORCID,Diouf Assane,Nasri Bouchra R.ORCID,de Montigny SimonORCID,Carabin HélèneORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of public health measures (PHMs) depends on population adherence. Social media were suggested as a tool to assess adherence, but representativeness and accuracy issues have been raised.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this repeated cross-sectional study were to compare self-reported PHM adherence and sociodemographic characteristics among people who used Twitter or not.

METHODS

Repeated Canada-wide online surveys were conducted every 14 days, from September 2020 until March 2022. Using Bayesian logistic regression models, we investigated associations between Twitter use, as well as opinions in tweets, and self-reported adherence with mask-wearing and vaccination.

RESULTS

Data from 40,230 respondents were analyzed. As self-reported, Twitter was used by 21% of Canadians, of whom 30% tweeted about COVID-19. The sociodemographic characteristics differed across categories of Twitter use and opinions. Overall, 11% of Canadians reported poor adherence to PHMs. Twitter users who tweeted about COVID-19 reported poorer adherence to mask-wearing than non-users, which was modified by the age of the respondents and their geographical region (odds ratios: 0.79 (0.18-1.69) to 4.83 (3.13-6.86). The odds of poor adherence to vaccination of Twitter users who tweeted about COVID-19 were 1.76 (1.48-2.07) greater than of non-users. English- and French-speaking Twitter users who tweeted critically of PHMs were, respectively, 4.07 (3.38-4.80) and 7.31 (4.26-11.03) more likely to report poor adherence to mask-wearing than non-Twitter users, and those who tweeted in support were, respectively, 0.47 (0.31-0.64) and 0.96 (0.18-2.33) less likely. The odds of poor adherence to vaccination for those tweeting critically about PHMs and for those tweeting in support of PHMs were 4.10 (3.40-4.85) and 0.20 (0.10-0.32), respectively, compared to non-Twitter users.

CONCLUSIONS

Opinions shared on Twitter can be useful to public health authorities as they are associated with adherence to PHMs. However, the sociodemographics of social media users do not represent the general population, calling for caution when using tweets to assess general population-level behaviours.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3