Cybersecurity risks and gaps in hospital clinical care: Summary review (for the non-cyber professional) (Preprint)

Author:

Wasserman LiatORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare is facing a growing threat of cyberattacks. Myriad data sources illustrate the same trends that healthcare is one of the industries with the highest risk of cyber infiltration and is seeing the rate of security incidents surge within just a few years. The circumstances thus begged the question: are US hospitals prepared for the risks that accompany clinical medicine in cyberspace?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the major topics and concerns present in today’s hospital cybersecurity field, intended for the non-cyber professionals audience in hospital settings.

METHODS

Via a structured literature search of the National Institutes of Health’s PubMed database (including the MEDLINE database) and Tel Aviv University’s DaTa database, 35 journal articles were identified to form the core of the study. 86 additional sources were examined to inform the study findings

RESULTS

The literature review revealed a basic landscape of hospital cybersecurity, including the top ten methods of attack, the primary reasons hospitals are frequent targets, and the consequences hospitals face following attacks. The cyber technologies common in clinical medicine, as well as their risks, were also examined, with the major categories highlighted being medical devices, telemedicine software, and electronic data. By infiltrating any of these three components of clinical care, cyber attackers can access a trove of valuable information and manipulate, steal, ransom, or otherwise compromise the records, or can use the access to catapult themselves to access other parts of a hospital’s network. Multiple secondary issues that can increase the cyber risks associated with devices, telemedicine, and electronic data were also identified. Finally, strategies that hospitals tend to employ to combat the cyber risks were explored and found to be subpar. There exist within hospitals’ cybersecurity measures serious vulnerabilities and gaps that many of today’s hospitals fail to address. The COVID-19 pandemic was used to further illustrate this issue.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the risks, strategies, and gaps revealed that many hospitals in the US are unprepared for cybersecurity risks. The focus of their efforts are misdirected, with external - often governmental - efforts negligible. Policy changes, such as training employees in cyber protocols, adding advanced technical protections, and collaborating with a variety of experts, are necessary. Overall, hospitals must recognize that, in cyber incidents, the real victims are the patients. They are the ones at risk, physically and in information confidentiality, when medical devices, hospital equipment, or treatments are compromised.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3