Accuracy of Smart Scales on Weight and Body Composition: Observational Study (Preprint)

Author:

Frija-Masson JustineORCID,Mullaert JimmyORCID,Vidal-Petiot EmmanuelleORCID,Pons-Kerjean NathalieORCID,Flamant MartinORCID,d'Ortho Marie-PiaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Smart scales are increasingly used at home by patients to monitor their body weight and body composition, but scale accuracy has not often been documented.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the research was to determine the accuracy of 3 commercially available smart scales for weight and body composition compared with dual x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the gold standard.

METHODS

We designed a cross-sectional study in consecutive patients evaluated for DEXA in a physiology unit in a tertiary hospital in France. There were no exclusion criteria except patient declining to participate. Patients were weighed with one smart scale immediately after DEXA. Three scales were compared (scale 1: Body Partner [Téfal], scale 2: DietPack [Terraillon], and scale 3: Body Cardio [Nokia Withings]). We determined absolute error between the gold standard values obtained from DEXA and the smart scales for body mass, fat mass, and lean mass.

RESULTS

The sample for analysis included 53, 52, and 48 patients for each of the 3 tested smart scales, respectively. The median absolute error for body weight was 0.3 kg (interquartile range [IQR] –0.1, 0.7), 0 kg (IQR –0.4, 0.3), and 0.25 kg (IQR –0.10, 0.52), respectively. For fat mass, absolute errors were –2.2 kg (IQR –5.8, 1.3), –4.4 kg (IQR –6.6, 0), and –3.7 kg (IQR –8.0, 0.28), respectively. For muscular mass, absolute errors were –2.2 kg (IQR –5.8, 1.3), –4.4 kg (IQR –6.6, 0), and –3.65 kg (IQR –8.03, 0.28), respectively. Factors associated with fat mass measurement error were weight for scales 1 and 2 (<i>P</i>=.03 and <i>P</i>&lt;.001, respectively), BMI for scales 1 and 2 (<i>P</i>=.034 and <i>P</i>&lt;.001, respectively), body fat for scale 1 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001), and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001 for both). Factors associated with muscular mass error were weight and BMI for scale 1 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001 and <i>P</i>=.004, respectively), body fat for scales 1 and 2 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001 for both), and muscular and bone mass for scale 2 (<i>P</i>&lt;.001 and <i>P</i>=.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Smart scales are not accurate for body composition and should not replace DEXA in patient care.

CLINICALTRIAL

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03803098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03803098

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3