Road and trail running from 5 km to ultra-marathon – Trends in Switzerland from 1999 to 2019 (Preprint)

Author:

Thuany Mabliny,Witthöft AnjaORCID,Valero DavidORCID,Forte PedroORCID,Weiss KatjaORCID,Scheer Volker,Nikolaidis Pantelis,Andrade Marilia,Cuk Ivan,Knechtle BeatORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent decades the number of runners has increased significantly, but until now, we have yet to learn about the profile of participants and different types of running terrains and distances.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare road and trail-based races for different distances for a whole country (Switzerland) over two decades (1999-2019).

METHODS

This is a secondary data-based study. We considered a total of 1,172,474 race records (801,960 men and 370,514 women) from the finishers of the 5 km, 10 km, half-marathon, marathon, and ultra-marathon races in Switzerland between 1999 and 2019. Data included the athletes’ gender, age, race distance, and type of race (road or trail). The men-to-women ratio was estimated, and box plots were used to present differences according to gender, age groups, and race distances in both terrains. Pearson correlation was estimated. The confidence interval was fixed at 95%.

RESULTS

The men-to-women ratio has generally decreased in all race distances over the years. Runners competing in a road-based race were faster than those in a trail run. Men performed better than women independently of age, except those competing in a 10 km trail run. In road-based races, higher differences in participation between genders were shown for older marathoners. For trail runs, a higher men-to-women ratio was shown for older half-marathoners and participants in 10 km races. For 5 km, 10 km, half-marathon, and ultra-marathon races, a decrease in running speed difference were shown until the age of 50 years, while marathoners presented an increase in speed differences among genders over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study emphasizes the importance of tracking participation and performance trends over time, considering racecourse characteristics. This information could help inform future research and policy decisions related to sports participation and performance.

CLINICALTRIAL

-

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3