“So, we need to optimise”: Applying the NASSS framework across implementation stages to identify key strategies to facilitate CDSS integration within a large metropolitan hospital system. (Preprint)

Author:

Fernando ManashaORCID,Abell BridgetORCID,Mcphail Steven MORCID,Tyack ZephanieORCID,Tariq AminaORCID,Naicker SundresanORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerised Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) enhance patient care through real-time evidence-based guidance for healthcare professionals. Despite this, the effective implementation of these systems within health services presents multifaceted challenges leading to inappropriate use and abandonment over time. Using the NASSS framework, this study examined CDSS adoption in a digitally mature metropolitan hospital, identifying determinants across implementation stages to optimise CDSS integration into healthcare practice.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the theory-informed (NASSS) determinants that either facilitate or hinder the application of CDSSs within the context of large-scale hospital services. Additionally, this study aimed to map these determinants onto specific stages of the implementation process, thereby developing a systems-level understanding of CDSS application across implementation stages.

METHODS

Participants involved in various stages of the implementation process were recruited (n=30). Participants took part in interviews and focus groups. Thematic analysis was used to categorize findings into barriers, enablers, or neutral determinants aligned to NASSS framework domains. These determinants were also mapped to implementation stages using the ‘Active Implementation Framework stages’ approach.

RESULTS

Participants comprised clinical adopters 47% (n=14), organizational champions 16% (n=5), and organizational clinical informatics 16% (n=5) roles. Most determinants mapped to organization level, technology and adopter sub-domains, consistent with the literature and our previous work. However, our findings also demonstrated a relative lack of long-term implementation planning. Consequently, determinants were distributed in a ‘U’ shape across implementation stages: 61% (n=77) linked to exploration, 31% (n=39) to full implementation, and just 5% (n=6) to installation stages. Stakeholders engaged in more pre-implementation and full-scale implementation activities, with fewer cycles of monitoring and iteration activities identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings addressed a significant knowledge gap in the literature by using systems thinking principles to identify the interdependent dynamics of CDSS implementation. A lack of sustained implementation strategies (i.e., training, and longer-term adopter level championing), weakened the socio-technical network between developers and adopters, leading to communication barriers. More rigorous implementation planning, encompassing all four implementation stages, may go some way in addressing the barriers identified and enhancing enablers.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3