Human-AI Teaming in Intensive Care: A Socio-Technical Systems View and International Delphi Study Among Data Scientists (Preprint)

Author:

Bienefeld NadineORCID,Keller EmanuelaORCID,Grote GudelaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning hold immense potential for enhancing clinical and administrative healthcare tasks. However, slow adoption and implementation challenges highlight the need to consider how humans can effectively collaborate with AI within the broader socio-technical system.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to explore the optimal utilization of human and AI capabilities by determining suitable levels of human-AI teaming for safely and meaningfully augmenting or automating tasks. We focus on intensive care units (ICUs) as an example and provide recommendations for policymakers and healthcare practitioners regarding AI deployment in healthcare settings.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic task analysis in six ICUs in Europe and carried out an international Delphi survey involving 19 health data scientists from academia and industry (response rate = 95%; 21% female; mean age = 38.6 years; mean experience = 12.63). Consensus was reached on the appropriate level of human-AI teaming for each task (Level 1 = no performance benefits from AI; Level 2 = AI augments human performance; Level 3 = Human augments AI performance; Level 4 = AI performs without human input). Ethical and social implications, as well as control and accountability distribution, were also considered by experts.

RESULTS

Levels 2 and 3 human-AI teaming were preferred choices for four out of six core ICU tasks. However, this recommendation relies on AI systems providing transparency, predictability, and user control. If these conditions are not met, reducing to Level 1 or shifting accountability away from users is advised. Additionally, when AI demonstrates near-perfect reliability, Level 4 automation can enhance safety and efficiency, especially when human-AI teaming conditions are not met. Importantly, AI experts agree that certain tasks should not be augmented or automated due to ethical and social concerns related to the physician/nurse-patient relationship and the roles of healthcare professionals in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

By considering the socio-technical system and determining appropriate levels of human-AI teaming, our study showcases the potential for improving the safety and effectiveness of AI utilization in ICUs and broader healthcare settings. Regulatory measures should prioritize transparency, predictability, and user control when users bear accountability. Ethical and social implications must be carefully evaluated to ensure effective collaboration between humans and AI, particularly in light of recent advancements in generative AI and large language models.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3