Assessment of medical device software supporting healthcare services for chronic patients: experience from a tertiary hospital (Preprint)

Author:

Baltaxe ErikORCID,Hsieh Moriah,Roca JosepORCID,Cano IsaacORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Innovative digital health tools are increasingly being evaluated and, in some instances, integrated at scale into health systems. However, applicability of assessment methodologies in real-life scenarios to demonstrate value generation and, consequently, foster sustainable adoption of digitally enabled health services still shows bottlenecks.

OBJECTIVE

To build on lessons learnt in the process of pre-market assessment of four digital health interventions piloted at Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (HCB), as well as in the analysis of current Medical Device Software (MDSW) regulations and post-market surveillance in EU and USA, to generate recommendations towards large scale adoption.

METHODS

Four digital health interventions using prototypes were piloted at HCB. Co-creation and quality improvement methodologies were used to consolidate a pragmatic evaluation method to assess end-user’s (both patients and healthcare professionals) perceived usability and satisfaction by means of the System Usability Scale and the Net Promoter Score, including general questions about satisfaction. Analyses of both Medical Software Device (MDSW) regulations and post-market surveillance in EU and USA (2017-2021) were done. Finally, an overarching analysis on lessons learnt was conducted considering four domains (technical, clinical, usability and cost), as well as differentiating among three different eHealth strategies (Telehealth, Integrated Care and Digital Therapeutics).

RESULTS

Among the participant stakeholders, the system usability scale was consistently higher in case of patients (78, 67, 56 and 76) than in health professionals (52, 43, and 54), and, in general terms, patients would recommend more the use of the supporting digital health tools (NPS of -3, 31, -21 and 31) than professionals (NPS of -67, 1 and -80). The overarching analysis resulted in pragmatic recommendations for the digital health evaluation domains and the eHealth strategies considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Lessons learnt on digitalisation of health resulted in practical recommendations that could contribute to fostering future deployment experiences.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3