Incorporating community partner perspectives on eHealth Technology Data Sharing Practices for the California Early Psychosis Intervention Network: Qualitative Study (Preprint)

Author:

Tully Laura M.ORCID,Nye Kathleen E.ORCID,Ereshefsky SabrinaORCID,Tryon Valerie L.ORCID,Hakusui Christopher Komei,Savill MarkORCID,Niendam Tara A.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased use of eHealth technology and user data to drive early identification and intervention algorithms in early psychosis necessitate implementation of ethical data use practices to increase user acceptability and trust.

OBJECTIVE

Explore EP community partner perspectives on data sharing best practices, including beliefs, attitudes, and preferences for ethical data sharing and how best to present end user license agreements (EULA).

METHODS

We conducted exploratory, qualitative, focus-group-based study design and content analysis assessing mental health data-sharing and privacy preferences. Data was gathered for the California Early Psychosis Intervention (EPI-CAL) network project in 2020-2021. Focus groups were conducted via video conferencing and assessed three EP groups: clinical staff/providers (n=14), clients (n=6), and family members (n=4). Eligible participants were affiliated with one of 18 EPI-CAL network clinics (i.e., convenience sampling), English-speaking, and able to provide written informed consent and assent (minors). Clinic staff/providers were invited from EPI-CAL clinics. Thirty clients and family members were invited through referral; 20 did not participate. Key themes identified via content analysis of focus group discussions.

RESULTS

Clinical staff participants (N = 14) were adults (M = 37.9, SD = 9.0), predominantly cisgender female (71%), White (64%), and non-Hispanic (64%). Clients (N = 6) were young adults (M = 23.8, SD = 3.9), predominantly male sex (67%) and non-Hispanic (83%), with no predominant race or gender identity. Family (N = 4) were middle-aged (M = 47.5, SD = 7.8), mostly cisgender female (75%), non-Hispanic (100%), with no predominant race. Participants were acutely aware of widespread third-party sharing across digital domains, risk of breaches, and motives hidden in legal language of EULAs. Consequently, they reported feeling loss of control and lack of protection over their data. These concerns can be mitigated via user-level control for data sharing with third parties and an understandable, transparent EULA including multiple presentation modalities, text at an 8th grade reading level, and clear definition of key terms.

CONCLUSIONS

Transparent EULAs with user-level control of data sharing are desired by consumers using eHealth technology and result in high data-sharing rates. EULAs designed in a manner consistent with EP consumers' preferences facilitates increased engagement in eHealth technology.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3