Telehealth adoption and the psychological factors that contribute to the use of video consultations in healthcare: A systematic review (Preprint)

Author:

Haydon Helen MORCID,Fowler James AORCID,Taylor Monica LORCID,Smith Anthony CORCID,Caffery Liam JORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are numerous benefits to delivering care via telehealth. Yet, healthcare professionals (HCPs) willingness to use telehealth is one of the greatest barriers to its adoption. Decisions regarding whether to use telehealth may be based on assumptions and concerns that are not necessarily borne of evidence. To effectively address psychological barriers to telehealth, it is essential to gain a better understanding of specific factors (e.g. attitudes, beliefs, emotions) that influence HCPs’ telehealth use, specifically engagement in video consultations.

OBJECTIVE

This study’s aim is to identify psychological factors in healthcare professionals that impair or promote telehealth use.

METHODS

Full-text peer-reviewed primary research articles based on Australian studies where video consultations were used to deliver health services were screened for psychological factors. A psychological factor was defined as an intra-individual influence related to, or in reaction to, telehealth. Data was extracted, and a thematic analysis generated the factors and themes.

RESULTS

From 4592 studies, data was extracted from 90 peer-reviewed articles. Cognitive and emotional motivators and inhibitors to telehealth use were found. These factors were complex and impacted upon one another. A cyclical relationship between these factors and intention to engage in video consultations and actual use of video consultations was found. These findings were used to form the Psychological Attributes of Video consultation Engagement (PAVE) model. Evidence suggests that HCPs fall within four key user-categories based on the amount of cognitive and practical effort needed to deliver video consultations.

CONCLUSIONS

Although further research is needed to validate the current findings, this study provides opportunity for more targeted interventions that address psychological factors impeding effective telehealth use.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3