Who do I trust more? Public Perception on AI-driven Mental health Interventions: A Survey research (Preprint)

Author:

Varghese Mahima AnnaORCID,Sharma PoonamORCID,Patwardhan MaitreyeeORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has gained importance in health care, sparking curiosity and concern. With a serious 1:834 doctor-patient ratio in India, AI could share a significant healthcare burden. Public perception is crucial in forming attitudes to facilitate the use of new technology. Similarly, acceptance of AI-driven mental health interventions would play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness and adoption of such technologies. Therefore, it imperative to study the use and perception of public towards prevailing AI driven mental health interventions by unveiling user experiences of AI driven services and opinion of future applicability in comparison to the traditional human based mental health interventions.

OBJECTIVE

To understand the use of AI-driven mental health interventions, perception and acceptance in comparison to the traditional human based mental health interventions.

METHODS

466 adult participants from India responded voluntarily to a 30-item web-based survey on the use and perception of AI-based Mental Health Interventions, between November and December 2023.

RESULTS

Of the 466 respondents, only 35% (N=466) have consulted mental health professionals. 65.4% have very low Knowledge of the AI-driven Interventions. 53% showed a moderate level and only 5.1% reported a high level of trust in AI-driven mental health interventions. On the contrary, 24.1% reported high and 66.3% reported moderate levels of trust with human-based mental health interventions. 51.9% people revealed that there is high level of stigma is associated with using human based interventions as compared to only 10.7% reported issue of stigma with AI driven interventions. 34.8% reported positively towards future use and social acceptance of AI Based interventions. Majority of people cited that AI could be a good option for General Mental Health tips and initial assessment. The key benefits of AI quoted were accessibility, cost effectiveness, round the clock availability and reduced stigma. Major concerns involved data privacy, security, lack of human touch and chances of misdiagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an overall lack of awareness towards AI-driven mental health interventions. AI could be a viable option for prevention, primary assessment, and maintaining mental health. To date, people feel a trusting attitude towards traditional mental health practices. Stigma plays a major role in the availing of traditional mental health services. As of now, the human touch is an invincible aspect of human-based mental health care irreplaceable by AI. AI use in mental health integrated with human mental health professionals is perceived to be a convincing model. AI is perceived positively on accessibility, availability, and de-stigmatisation. Knowledge and perception of trustworthiness are important factors in the acceptance and effectiveness of AI-driven Mental health interventions.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3