Factors influencing the use of online symptom checkers in the United Kingdom: A cross-sectional study (Preprint)

Author:

El-Osta AustenORCID,Riboli-Sasco EvaORCID,Al Ammouri MahmoudORCID,Altalib SamiORCID,Luisa Neves AnaORCID,Majeed AzeemORCID,Hayhoe BenedictORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

As the strain on the National Health Service worsens, the growing demand for health information, increasing consumer empowerment and health awareness, and the pervasiveness of smartphones and internet, are positioning online symptom checkers (OSCs) as tools for preliminary diagnosis and medical advice. Data on the demographics, motivations, and perspectives of current and potential users of OSCs living in the United Kingdom (UK) remains scarce, and no study has yet quantified or ranked the various factors associated with the use of OSCs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess key trends and user perceptions on the usability and effectiveness of OSC. We also sought to identify concerns related to the privacy, security and accuracy of OSCs, and to quantify the weight of these various factors on the use of OSCs among community-dwelling adults in the UK.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of UK adults was conducted using an electronic questionnaire. A convenience sample was recruited between February and March 2024 through online platforms and personal networks. The survey included questions on awareness, use, perceptions and concerns regarding OSCs, as well as respondents’ demographics. Responses were pseudo-anonymised and analysed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models to assess relationships between demographic factors, perceived usability, reliability and risks and OSC use.

RESULTS

The survey collected responses from 634 participants. The majority (85.7%) of participants had used OSCs, primarily the NHS 111 service (78.6%). Younger age (below 46 years old), being female (aOR=1.79, 95%CI 1.05 – 3.06) and having children (aOR= 3.19, 95%CI 1.56 - 6.51) were associated with higher odds of using OSCs. Key motivations for using OSCs included understanding symptoms (79.0%) and determining the need for medical care (77.4%). Key concerns negatively impacting use related to privacy (aOR=0.58) and fear of replacing traditional, face-to-face consultations (aOR=0.47). The most important factor found to affect the decision to use OSCs was the perceived ease of use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=8.17), followed by the perceived helpfulness in decision-making (aOR=2.96), and respondents’ trust in their diagnostic accuracy (aOR=2.24).

CONCLUSIONS

OSCs are widely used in the UK, particularly the NHS 111 service, driven primarily by ease of use and perceived helpfulness in decision support. However, privacy and security concerns, as well as fears of OSCs replacing traditional consultations, pose significant barriers. Addressing these concerns is crucial for enhancing user trust and maximizing the benefits of OSCs in supporting self-care and improving healthcare efficiency.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3