Assessing the Usage and Usability of a Mental Health Advice Telephone Service in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

Author:

Kabukye Johnblack K.ORCID,Nakku JulietORCID,Niwemuhwezi Jackie,Nsereko James Roger,Namagembe RosemaryORCID,Groen Iris E. D.ORCID,Neumbe Rita,Mubiru Denis,Kisakye Caroline,Nanyonga Roseline,Sjölinder MarieORCID,Nilsson SusanneORCID,Wamala-Larsson CarolineORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Harnessing mobile health (mHealth) solutions could improve the delivery of mental health services and reduce their impact in Uganda and similar low-resource settings. However, successful adoption requires that mHealth solutions have good usability. We have previously implemented a telephone service to provide mental health information and advice in English and Luganda using an automated (interactive voice response) system and linkage to live agents that include mental healthcare workers and peer support workers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the usage and usability of this mental health telephone service.

METHODS

We obtained usage data from the system call logs for 18 months to study the call volumes and trends. We then surveyed callers to obtain their characteristics and assess usability using the telehealth usability questionnaire. Additionally, call recordings were assessed for conversation quality using the telephone nursing dialogue process by three independent healthcare professionals, and correlations between quality and usability aspects were investigated.

RESULTS

In 18 months, 2863 meaningful calls (i.e., went past the welcome message) from 1125 unique telephone numbers were made to the system. 1153 (40.3%) stopped at the pre-recorded interactive voice response information, and 1710 (59.7%) chose to speak to an agent; of which 1292 (75.6%) were answered, 393 (23.0%) went to voicemail and were returned in the following working days, and 25 (1.5%) were not answered. Usage was generally sustained over time, with spikes in calls corresponding to marketing events. The survey (n=240) revealed that most callers were caregivers of mental health patients (60%) or the general public (19.2%), and few were mental health patients (18.3%). Additionally, majority were male (59.6%), spoke English (75.0%), had post-secondary education (68.3%), lived one hour or less from Butabika Hospital (77.9%), and were aged 25-44 (66.7%). The overall usability score for the system was 4.12 on a 5-point scale, significantly higher than the recommended target usability score of 4 (p-value = 0.006). Mean scores for usability components ranged from 3.66 for Reliability, and 4.41 for Ease of use, and all components but Reliability were higher than 4 or within its confidence interval. Usability scores were higher for Luganda than English speakers, but there was no association with other participant characteristics such as sex, distance from the hospital, age, marital status, duration of symptoms, or treatment status. The quality of call conversations (n=50) was 4.35 out of 5 and significantly correlated with usability (Pearson r = 0.34, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found sustained usage of the mental health telephone service, with good user experience and high satisfaction across different user characteristics. Mobile health solutions like these should be embraced and replicated to improve the delivery of health services in Uganda and similar low-resource settings.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3