Nowcasting to Monitor Real-Time Mpox Trends During the 2022 Outbreak in New York City: An Evaluation Using Reportable Disease Data Stratified by Race or Ethnicity (Preprint)

Author:

Rohrer RebeccaORCID,Wilson AllegraORCID,Baumgartner JenniferORCID,Burton NicoleORCID,Ortiz Ray RORCID,Dorsinville AlanORCID,Jones Lucretia EORCID,Greene Sharon KORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Applying nowcasting methods to partially accrued reportable disease data can help policymakers interpret recent epidemic trends and quickly identify and remediate health inequities. During the 2022 mpox outbreak in New York City (NYC), we applied Nowcasting by Bayesian Smoothing (NobBS) to estimate recent cases, citywide and stratified by race or ethnicity. However, in real time, it was unclear if estimates were accurate.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the accuracy of estimated mpox case counts across a range of NobBS implementation options.

METHODS

We evaluated NobBS performance for NYC residents with confirmed or probable mpox diagnosis or illness onset from July 8 through September 30, 2022, as compared with fully accrued cases. We used the mean absolute error (MAE), relative root mean square error (rRMSE), and 95% prediction interval (PI) coverage to compare moving window lengths, stratifying or not by race or ethnicity, diagnosis and onset time elements, and daily and weekly time units.

RESULTS

During the study period, 3305 NYC residents were diagnosed with mpox (median 4 days from diagnosis to diagnosis report), and 2278 patients had known illness onset (median 10 days from onset to onset report). No single moving window length performed best. As window lengths increased from 14 to 49 days, generally, MAE improved (decreased), while rRMSE worsened (increased). For the diagnosis time element, for the 14-day moving window used in real time, MAE was 9, rRMSE was 0.23, and 95% PI coverage was 96%; ranges for longer moving windows were MAE: 3–9, rRMSE: 0.25–0.30, and 95% PI coverage: 93%–100%. For the onset time element, for the 21-day moving window used in real time, MAE was 12, rRMSE was 1.07, and 95% PI coverage was 84%; ranges for other moving windows were MAE: 7–11, rRMSE: 0.75–1.42, and 95% PI coverage: 75%–99%. For any given moving window length, rRMSE worsened (increased) for stratified compared with unstratified estimates. For stratified daily diagnosis hindcasts, for the 14-day moving window used in real time, rRMSE was 0.32, and 95% PI coverage was 95%; ranges for other moving window lengths were rRMSE: 0.35–0.50 and 95% PI coverage: 96%–100%. Performance generally worsened when using onset compared with diagnosis time elements and weekly compared with daily time units. Hindcasts underestimated diagnoses in early August after the epidemic peaked, then overestimated diagnoses in late August during epidemic waning. Estimates were most accurate during September, when cases were low and stable.

CONCLUSIONS

For nowcasting this outbreak using NobBS, accuracy depended on the moving window length and whether cases were stratified. Health departments need additional nowcasting guidance, particularly to promote health equity by ensuring stratified estimates are accurate and to improve robustness, such as by incorporating multiple methods.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3