Worldwide Presence of National Anesthesia Societies on Four Major Social Networks in 2021: Observational Case Study (Preprint)

Author:

Clavier ThomasORCID,Occhiali EmilieORCID,Guenet ClaireORCID,Vannier NaurineORCID,Hache CamilleORCID,Compere VincentORCID,Selim JeanORCID,Besnier EmmanuelORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the presence of medical societies on social networks (SNs) could be interesting for disseminating professional information, there is no study investigating their presence on SNs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this viewpoint is to describe the worldwide presence and activity of national anesthesia societies on SNs.

METHODS

This observational study assessed the active presence (≥1 post in the year preceding the collection date) of the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists member societies on the SNs Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube. We collected data concerning each anesthesia society on the World Federation of Societies of Anesthesiologists website.

RESULTS

Among the 136 societies, 66 (48.5%) had an active presence on at least one SN. The most used SN was Facebook (n=60, 44.1%), followed by Twitter (n=37, 27.2%), YouTube (n=26, 19.1%), and Instagram (n=16, 11.8%). The SN with the largest number of followers was Facebook for 52 (78.8%) societies and Twitter for 12 (18.2%) societies. The number of followers was 361 (IQR 75-1806) on Twitter, 2494 (IQR 1049-5369) on Facebook, 1400 (IQR 303-3058) on Instagram, and 214 (IQR 33-955) on YouTube. There was a strong correlation between the number of posts and the number of followers on Twitter (<i>r</i>=0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; <i>P</i>&lt;.001), Instagram (<i>r</i>=0.83, 95% CI 0.58-0.94; <i>P</i>&lt;.001), and YouTube (<i>r</i>=0.69, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; <i>P</i>&lt;.001). According to the density of anesthetists in the country, there was no difference between societies with and without active SN accounts.

CONCLUSIONS

Less than half of national anesthesia societies have at least one active account on SNs. Twitter and Facebook are the most used SNs.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3