Can Watson for Oncology replace oncologists: A comparative study between Watson for Oncology and our multidisciplinary tumor board (Preprint)

Author:

Liu ChaoyuanORCID,Liu XianlingORCID,Wu Fang,Xie Mingxuan,Feng YeqianORCID,Hu ChunhongORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence(AI)is developing quickly in the medical field, which gives convenience to both medical staff and patients. The AI CDSS Watson for Oncology (WFO) is an outstanding representative of AI in medical field, it can give prompt treatment recommendations to cancer patients, just as an excellent oncologist. It is more and more widely used in China, but there is no report about whether it suits Chinese patients. Here we report a retrospective study about the consistency of WFO's recommendations and commendations of the same patient given by our multi-disciplinary team board(MDT) at our center on lung cancer patients’ treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to explore practicability of the WFO to the lung cancer cases in China and how to make it more suitable for Chinese patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

We selected all the lung cancer patients who were hospitalized and received antitumor treatment in the 2nd Xiangya hospital cancer center for the first time from September to December in 2017. WFO gave treatment recommendations to all qualified cases. If our actual therapeutic regimen (which was given by our MDT) was “recommended” or “for consideration” in WFO, we thought it was of consistency, if it was “not recommended” or WFO didn’t have this option, we thought it was of no consistency. Blind second round reviews were made by our MDT to reassess the incongruent cases.

RESULTS

WFO didn’t support 18% of all the cases (n=182). Of the 149 cases (82%) supported, 66% were consistent with our MDT recommendations. Subgroup analysis showed that pathological type and staging had a significant effect on consistency (p=0.004, p=0, respectively). Age, gender, whether there was gene mutation or not had no effect on consistency. In 81% of the inconsistent cases, our MDT gave two treatments with Chinese characteristics , which were different from recommendations given by WFO but were also with excellent effect. If WFO can bring the two alternative treatments into the recommended or considered range, the overall consistency can be elevated from 66% to 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

In China, the majority of the treatment recommendations of WFO are consistent with the recommendation of the expert group, but there is still a relative high proportion of cases which are not supported by WFO. WFO cannot substitute our oncologists currently. As doctors’ assistant, it can improve the efficiency of our work, and it needs to learn local characteristics of patients to become a better assistant.

CLINICALTRIAL

none

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3