Patient and provider experience with virtual care in a large, ambulatory care hospital in Ontario, Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: An observational study (Preprint)

Author:

Chu Cherry,Nayyar Dhruv,Bhattacharya OnilORCID,Martin Danielle,Agarwal PayalORCID,Mukerji Geetha

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Virtual care use increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact on patient and provider experience of that shift is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated patient and provider experience with virtual visits across an academic, ambulatory hospital in Toronto, Canada and assessed predictors of positive experience with virtual care.

METHODS

Survey data was analyzed from consenting patients who attended at least one virtual visit (video or telephone) and from consenting providers who delivered at least one virtual visit. Distributions for demographic variables and responses to survey questions are reported, with statistical significance assessed using chi-square tests and t-tests. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify any patient predictors of responses.

RESULTS

During the study period, 253 patients (mean age(SD) 45.1 years (15.6)) completed 517 video visit surveys and 147 patients (41.6 (16.4)), completed 209 telephone visit surveys. A total of 75 and 94 providers completed the survey in June 2020 and June 2021, respectively. On a scale of 1-10 regarding likelihood to recommend virtual care to others, fewer providers rated a score of 8 or above compared to patients (providers: 66.0% for video and 52.2% for telephone versus patients: 80.3% for video and 71.8% for telephone). Patients of non-White ethnicity had lower odds of rating a high score of 9 or 10 compared to white patients (OR(95% CI) 0.52(0.28-0.99)).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient experiences with virtual care were generally positive, but provider experiences were less so. Findings suggest potential differences in patient experience by ethnicity, warranting further investigation into equity concerns with virtual care.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3