The impact of telemedicine on patient-centered communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study (Preprint)

Author:

Barr Paul JamesORCID,Onsando Wambui MoraaORCID,Bratches Reed,Cavanaugh Kerri,Schoonmaker Jesse Asher,Freundlich Noah,Salih Yasir,Makhoul Gregory,Masel Meredith

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High quality patient-centered communication (PCC) is the lynchpin of excellent health care, associated with improved patient experience, patient engagement and health related outcomes. The COVID-19 Pandemic necessitated a switch to telehealth and the implementation of in-person safety protocols (e.g., face masks and restrictions on in-person caregiver clinic attendance). It is unclear to what extend PCC in the healthcare setting was impacted.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the current investigation was to characterize how PCC was impacted by safety measures adopted in response to COVID-19 Pandemic.

METHODS

From September to October 2020, we administered an online 38-item cross-sectional survey to a convenience sample of US adults reporting both in-person and telehealth clinic visits during the pandemic. We assessed PCC using the Communication Assessment Tool and explored differences between in-person and telehealth PCC (repeated measures ANOVA) and factors associated with PCC (multiple linear regression).

RESULTS

The majority of the 522 respondents were female (58.2%), with an average age of 46.1 years (SD 18.9). Most of the visits were for primary care, though specialty care made up a greater proportion of in-person visits. Most respondents reported always wearing masks when visiting in-person (n=432, 82.7%), while 71.1% of patients observed clinicians always wearing masks. Other commonly observed safety protocols included socially distanced waiting rooms (n=424, 81.2%) and screening at the clinic entrance (n=399, 76.4%). Using ANOVA, PCC was higher overall for in-person visits compared to telehealth (45% vs. 42%; P=.003). Specifically, in-person PCC was higher for respondents of Hispanic ethnicity (32% vs. 26%; P=.012), who spoke a language other than English at home (33% vs. 28%; P=.01), aged ≥65 years (55% vs. 50%; P=.051), aged 18 – 34 years (33% vs. 30%; P<.001) and women (48% vs. 43%; P=.002). In regression analysis, respondents aged 18-34 (???? = -0.13; 95% CI = -0.24, -0.01) and caregiver presence (???? = -0.11, 95%CI = -0.19, -0.04) were associated with lower PCC during telehealth visits; while mask use was associated with lower PCC in older adults during in-person visits (???? = -0.46; 95% CI = -0.86, -0.07). Having ≥3 visits was associated with higher PCC both during in-person (???? = 0.1; 95% CI = 0.0, 0.20) and telehealth (???? = 0.11; 95% CI = 0.01, 0.20) visits.

CONCLUSIONS

PCC was reported to be better in a sample of patients who experienced in-person and telehealth visits during the pandemic. Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic may have had disproportionally negative impacts on PCC that require further investigation as the first step to addressing inequalities in communication and access that affect healthcare outcomes.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3