The use of memes as an educational tool to evaluate reflection levels in an evidence-based practice course for nutrition graduate students (Preprint)

Author:

Douglas Crystal C.ORCID,Messenger ChristopherORCID,Lyons Elizabeth J.ORCID,Arentson-Lantz Emily J.ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Memes are a popular online communication tool that are participatory, playful and contextual in nature. While the use of meme creation as an education tool in higher education has been limited, meme creation requires students to reflect on material presented in the classroom, synthesize new content from learned concepts, and present it in a contextualized manner.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the outcomes of a meme creation assignment introduced into a master's level nutrition course which covered systemic and ethical issues related to nutrition, research, and clinical practice. Additionally, we explored the topics students chose to engage with in the meme assignment and how they aligned with course objectives.

METHODS

Participants were graduate-level dietetic students (n=55) enrolled in the Evidence Based Practice course in the Master of Science/Dietetic Internship Program offered by the Department of Nutrition Sciences and Health Behavior in the School of Health Professions at the University of Texas Medical Branch. The team conducted a two-phase analysis of the memes. First, we assessed each meme for depth of reflection using an existing quantitative framework ranging from 0 (description) to 4 (critical reflection). In the second phase, we conducted a hybrid thematic analysis using inductive codes and deductive codes associated with the learning objectives of the class.

RESULTS

Most students enrolled in the class were female (92.7%) and non-Hispanic white (63%) with an average age of 23.8 y. Of the 82 memes submitted, 9 (11%) were rated as reflection level 0 (description), 11 (13.4%) as level 1 (reflective description), 26 (31.7% as level 2 (dialogic reflection), 15 (18.3%) as level 3 (transformative reflection) and 21 (25.6%) as level 4 (critical reflection). Four primary themes, Ethics, Philosophy of Science, Art of Science and Science and the Public were identified, which aligned the learning objectives of the class, namely for students to develop a wider perspective of the philosophy of science and research paradigms, as well as ethical issues and scientific communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm that the use of a meme creation assignment is a feasible and acceptable education tool to promote student reflection in the context of an evidence-based practice class for graduate students. Students displayed a higher-than-expected level of transformative or critical reflection which may be due to the playful, visual format of memes. Future work is needed to investigate if our results are generalizable to other student populations or courses.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3