Exploring Psychotherapists’ Attitudes on Internet- and Mobile-Based Interventions: A Thematic Analysis (Preprint)

Author:

Hildebrand Anne SophieORCID,Planert JariORCID,Machulska AllaORCID,Margraf Lena Maria,Roesmann KatiORCID,Klucken TimORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, internet- and mobile-based interventions gained relevance in mental health care. Psychotherapists' perspectives are crucial in identifying potential improvements as well as barriers to the implementation of these interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore psychotherapists’ perspectives on the barriers and facilitating conditions to internet- and mobile-based interventions.

METHODS

The study consisted of a qualitative research design, utilizing open items on a cross-sectional survey. In total, 350 psychotherapists were asked to provide their opinion on different aspects of internet- and mobile-based interventions in written form. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data and to identify core themes.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed 11 core themes on using internet- and mobile-based interventions, falling into the four superordinate categories: 1) “Applicability” (“Disorder-related Limitations”, “Facilitating Structures”, “Psychotherapeutic Specialization”, “Role in Mental Health Care”); 2) “Treatment Resources” (“Lack of Information”, “Costs and Efforts”); 3) “Technology” (“Technical Constraints”, “Technical Requirements and Functions”, “Data Protection and Privacy”); and 4) “Perceived Risks and Barriers” (“Perceived Risks and Barriers for Patients”, and “Perceived Risks and Barriers for Psychotherapists”).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study highlight the need for considering psychotherapists’ attitudes in the conceptualization of internet- and mobile-based interventions. It is discussed how these findings can advance both the use of internet- and mobile-based interventions in mental health care and the societal debate revolving around it. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3