A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy and Capability of Artificial Intelligence Solutions in Healthcare Exams and Certificates (Preprint)

Author:

Waldock William JoelORCID,Zhang JoeORCID,Guni AhmadORCID,Nabeel Ahmad,Darzi AraORCID,Ashrafian HutanORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large Language Models (LLM) have dominated public interest due to their apparent capability to accurately replicate learned knowledge in narrative text.

OBJECTIVE

In response to this rapidly progressing field, we aimed to establish a baseline performance and quality standard for the current generation of LLMs in narrative medical response tasks.

METHODS

We quantified the accuracy of LLMs in responding to healthcare examination questions, and evaluated the consistency and quality of study reporting. The protocol was registered with OSF (https://osf.io/xqzkw). The search included all papers up until 09/10/2023, at which point a preliminary search was conducted and piloting of study selection process was commenced using MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, Cochrane Library and Health Technology Assessment Database, alongside the OVID search interface. The literature search included the following MeSH terms used in all possible combinations: ‘artificial intelligence’, ‘ChatGPT’, ‘GPT’, ‘LLM’, ‘Large Language Model’, ‘machine learning’, ‘neural network’, ‘Generative Pre-trained Transformer’, ‘Generative Transformer’, ‘Generative Language Model’, ‘Generative Model’, ‘medical exam’, ‘healthcare exam’ ‘clinical exam’. Sensitivity, accuracy and precision data was extracted, including the relevant confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The search identified 1673 relevant citations. After removing duplicate results, 1268 articles were screened for titles and abstracts, and 32 studies were included for full-text review. Our meta-analysis suggests that LLMs are able to perform with an overall medical exam accuracy of 0.61 (CI 0.58, 0.64), an LLM on the USMLE accuracy of 0.51 (CI 0.46, 0.56), and a ChatGPT on medical exams overall accuracy of 0.64 (CI 0.6, 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

For policy and deployment decisions about Large Language Models to advance healthcare, we propose a new framework called RUBRICC - Regulatory, Usability, Bias, Reliability (Evidence & Safety), Interoperability, Cost, & Co-design-PPIE. This presents a valuable opportunity to direct the clinical commissioning of new LLM capabilities into health services whilst respecting patient safety considerations.

CLINICALTRIAL

OSF (https://osf.io/xqzkw)

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3