Understanding Headspace Use during a COVID-19 Response Program: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study (Preprint)

Author:

Borghouts JudithORCID,Eikey Elizabeth VORCID,De Leon CinthiaORCID,Schueller Stephen MORCID,Schneider MargaretORCID,Stadnick Nicole AORCID,Zheng KaiORCID,Mukamel Dana BORCID,Sorkin Dara HORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 global pandemic has contributed to increases in mental health issues such as depression and anxiety due to the increase of social isolation, uncertainty, and misinformation while at the same time making it harder to access mental health resources. In response to the pandemic, four counties/cities in California began offering a free mindfulness meditation app known as Headspace as a mental health resource for their communities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to capture characteristics of people who decided to use, stop using, or not use Headspace within the context of a COVID-19 response program launched in April 2020 which offered Headspace licenses for free to community members.

METHODS

Participants (n = 2,725) completed a 20-minute online survey between July 1, 2021 and October 21, 2022. All participants who had signed up for Headspace through the program (N = 92,311) were sent an email inviting them to complete the survey, which was voluntary and unpaid. Logistic regression models were used to examine relationships between continued use of Headspace and the prevalence of mental health problems, mental healthcare utilization, frequency of Headspace use, user experience with Headspace, and mental health stigma.

RESULTS

76% of respondents were still using Headspace at the time of completing the survey. People who were still using Headspace were more likely to experience mental health challenges and distress and reporter greater use of other digital mental health resources (i.e. online tools and connecting with people online) than people who were not using Headspace. Additionally, people who used the app on a more frequent basis were more likely to continue using it, and current Headspace users rated the app higher on user experience compared to past users. The most common reasons for abandoning Headspace were that people were already using other strategies to support their mental health (35%), no longer needed Headspace (13%), and/or did not think Headspace would be useful (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

We discuss potential implications of our findings for offering and using apps such as Headspace as a mental health resource, along with factors that influence engagement with this app.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3