Understanding and addressing challenges with Electronic Health Record use in gynaecological oncology: a cross-sectional survey of multidisciplinary professionals in the United Kingdom and co-design of an integrated informatics platform to support clinical decision making. (Preprint)

Author:

Lear RachaelORCID,Tookman Laura,Averill Phoebe,Samani Amit,Hunt Ashton,Papadimitriou Dimitri,Nkolobe Baleseng,Ghaem-Maghami Sadaf,Glampson Ben,McNeish Iain,Mayer Erik KORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefits and challenges of Electronic Health Record (EHR) use may be particularly significant in complex, high-risk specialties such as gynaecological oncology, yet few studies address the experiences of end-users.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore perspectives on EHR use in gynaecological oncology and to develop an informatics platform for ovarian cancer.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire to capture UK professional experiences of EHR use. Free-text responses were analysed using content analysis; counts and proportions were calculated for quantitative data. An informatics platform was co-designed using human-centred design. Natural language processing was used to extract genomic results and operative details from free-text documentation.

RESULTS

Of 92 respondents, 84 (92.3%) access multiple electronic systems for clinical decision-making, with 28.6% (26/91) using ≥5 EHR systems. Around 17% (16/92) spend more than 50% of their clinical time looking for information in the EHR. Key challenges relate to fragmentation of the patient record across disparate systems meaning retrieval of pertinent information is often time-consuming. The main benefit of EHR use was perceived to be ease-of-access to patient information, yet 60.0% (54/90) of respondents do not have access to individual patient summaries. Our co-designed ovarian cancer informatics platform brings together patient data from different electronic systems and displays it in a single location to support clinical decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

EHR systems are not currently optimised to support decision-making in gynae-oncology. Co-designed clinical decision support tools could address challenges with data fragmentation and information retrieval towards improvements in the quality and safety of cancer care.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3