A Web-Based, Provider-Driven Mobile App to Enhance Patient Care Coordination Between Dialysis Facilities and Hospitals: Development and Pilot Implementation Study (Preprint)

Author:

Plantinga Laura CORCID,Hoge CourtneyORCID,Vandenberg Ann EORCID,James KyleORCID,Masud TahsinORCID,Khakharia AnjaliORCID,Gray CarolORCID,Jaar Bernard GORCID,Lea Janice PORCID,O'Donnell Christopher MORCID,Mutell RichardORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We piloted a web-based, provider-driven mobile app (<i>DialysisConnect</i>) to fill the communication and care coordination gap between hospitals and dialysis facilities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the development and pilot implementation of <i>DialysisConnect</i>.

METHODS

<i>DialysisConnect</i> was developed iteratively with focus group and user testing feedback and was made available to 120 potential users at 1 hospital (hospitalists, advanced practice providers [APPs], and care coordinators) and 4 affiliated dialysis facilities (nephrologists, APPs, nurses and nurse managers, social workers, and administrative personnel) before the start of the pilot (November 1, 2020, to May 31, 2021). Midpilot and end-of-pilot web-based surveys of potential users were also conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to describe system use patterns, ratings of multiple satisfaction items (1=not at all; 3=to a great extent), and provider-selected motivators of and barriers to using <i>DialysisConnect</i>.

RESULTS

The pilot version of <i>DialysisConnect</i> included clinical information that was automatically uploaded from dialysis facilities, forms for entering critical admission and discharge information, and a direct communication channel. Although physicians comprised most of the potential users of <i>DialysisConnect</i>, APPs and dialysis nurses were the most active users. Activities were unevenly distributed; for example, 1 hospital-based APP recorded most of the admissions (280/309, 90.6%) among patients treated at the pilot dialysis facilities. End-of-pilot ratings of <i>DialysisConnect</i> were generally higher for users versus nonusers (eg, “I can see the potential value of <i>DialysisConnect</i> for my work with dialysis patients”: mean 2.8, SD 0.4, vs mean 2.3, SD 0.6; <i>P</i>=.02). Providers most commonly selected reduced time and energy spent gathering information as a motivator (11/26, 42%) and a lack of time to use the system as a barrier (8/26, 31%) at the end of the pilot.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study found that APPs and nurses were most likely to engage with the system. Survey participants generally viewed the system favorably while identifying substantial barriers to its use. These results inform how best to motivate providers to use this system and similar systems and inform future pragmatic research in care coordination among this and other populations.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3