Novel Mixed Methods Approach to Analyze Web-Based Discussion Boards and Social Media Platforms: Gynecological Cancer Survivorship Care in the Words of the Survivor (Preprint)

Author:

Adams Elizabeth J.ORCID,Tallman David,Haynam Marcy L.,Nekhlyudov Larissa,Lustberg Maryam B.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Internet and social media platforms offer insight into the experience of patients and cancer survivors, but the volume of narrative data is often cumbersome for thorough analysis. Gynecologic cancer survivors in particular have unique survivorship concerns.

OBJECTIVE

We present a unique methodology to leverage large amounts of data from internet-based platforms for mixed methods analysis. To demonstrate our approach, we analyzed discussion board posts from gynecologic cancer survivors discussing their psychosocial experience of disease on the American Cancer Society (ACS) website.

METHODS

All posts from three gynecological cancer discussion boards on the ACS Cancer Survivors Network were analyzed. Posts were downloaded, or “web-scraped,” using custom Python scripts and subsequently organized by psychosocial themes described in the Cancer Survivorship Care Framework. Organization by psychosocial themes was facilitated via keywords that were generated and verified. Quantitative analysis was completed using custom Python scripts and R packages. Qualitative analysis was expedited by our methodology and was completed on a subset of posts.

RESULTS

A total of 125,498 posts made by 6,436 gynecological cancer survivors and caregivers between July 2000 and February 2020 were evaluated. Of the 125,489 posts, 23,458 were related to the psychosocial experience of cancer and were included for a mixed methods psychosocial analysis. Quantitative analysis revealed that survivors across all gynecological discussion boards frequently discussed the role of friends and family in care, fatigue, the effect of cancer on interpersonal relationships, and health insurance status. Words related to psychosocial aspects of survivorship that were used most often in posts included, “family,” “hope,” and “help.” Qualitative analysis similarly demonstrated that survivors frequently discussed coping, family, and caregiver relationships, where survivors described and sought advice on areas such as spousal emotional support and adjustment, financial toxicity, and confronting mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Online discussion-based platforms offer great opportunity to learn about patient experiences of survivorship. Our novel methodology expedites the quantitative and qualitative analysis of such robust data.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3