Assessing the Accessibility of Content for Hospice and Palliative Fellowship Programs (Preprint)

Author:

Zhou Yuan,Liu Wenxue,Gurijala Nyshidha,Quan TheodoreORCID,Aligabi Zahra,Nguyen Kenneth T.,Aligabi Nurfatimeh,Aligabi Hussein,Li Yuqiang,Wei Chapman,Al-Beyati Refka

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been an increasing trend in patients seeking palliative care in both inpatient and outpatient settings. A majority of the US population that receives palliative care is over 65 years old. It is projected that the geriatric population will increase 55% by 2030. As the geriatric population continues to increase, it becomes important to have a sufficient number of high-quality trained hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) physicians. To increase the supply of HPM physicians, HPM fellowship programs need to have effective recruitment strategies. Websites can be effective tools in engaging and recruiting applicants.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the accessibility and website content of HPM fellowship programs.

METHODS

A list of accredited HPM fellowship programs was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Education Public Directory in May 2020. Programs without a website were excluded. Website accessibility and content evaluation were assessed. Evaluation of website content was broken down into three domains that previous studies have shown are information that applicants seek on websites- Program Content, Applicant/Recruitment Content, and Education Content.

RESULTS

151 HPM websites were included for analysis. On average, program websites were easily accessible within 1 click from a ‘Google’ search. Upon assessing program content, all programs provided a description. 74.2% of websites provided the program director’s name. Less than 50% of websites provide the program’s address, phone number, or email-address. 44.4% provided the names of the current fellows, and 66.2% provided a faculty list. Upon assessing application/recruitment content, 46% of websites provide information about general application requirements. While most websites do not provide the number of letter of recommendations needed, 42.4% ask for three letters. 13.2% of websites indicate a submission deadline. Upon examining education content, 66.9% of websites provided information about didactics and 55.0% provided information about journal club. Roughly 74% provided information about rotation schedule, clinic responsibility, and research opportunities.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains a paucity in valuable web-based information to applicants of HPM fellowships. HPM fellowship program websites need to be updated to help applicants make informed decisions and increase recruitment into HPM fellowship programs.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3