Cognitive Bias Modification Training Targeting Fatigue in Kidney Patients: Patients’ and Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives (Preprint)

Author:

Geerts Jody AmberORCID,Pieterse Marcel E.ORCID,Laverman Gozewijn D.ORCID,Waanders FemkeORCID,Oosterom NicoleORCID,Slegten Jacqueline T.,Salemink ElskeORCID,Bode ChristinaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is an important symptom for many patients, including kidney patients. Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) training is a promising technique to counter fatigue symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to evaluate a CBM training among kidney patients and health care professionals. Using an iterative design process, evaluating expectations and experiences with the training, acceptability and applicability in the clinical setting were assessed.

METHODS

This study is a longitudinal, qualitative, and multiple stakeholder-perspective usability study interviewing end-users and health care professionals during the prototyping phase and after end of training. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 patients and 16 health care professionals. The interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Generally, participants were positive about the training and its applicability. The biggest negatives were doubts about effectiveness and annoyance about the repetitive character of CBM. Barriers for applicability were patients’ varying computer skills, the subjectivity of fatigue, and integration with regular treatment, (e.g., role of health care professionals). Possible solutions were assigning representatives among nurses, offering the training on an app, and providing assistance via a helpdesk. The iterative design process, including the repeated waves of testing user expectations and experiences, yielded complementary data.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study provided one of the first user evaluations of a CBM training, both among patients and care providers. Acceptability and applicability appear positive although barriers were identified. The proposed solutions need further testing, preferably following the same frameworks, as the iteration in the current study contributed positively to the quality of the training.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3