Use of fitness trackers in patient-centred healthcare research: a systematic review (Preprint)

Author:

Khetrapal PramitORCID,Ang Kar Mun,Chau Marisa,Ó Scanaill Pádraig,Mcalister John,Kelly John D

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fitness trackers are increasingly popular consumer electronic devices which provide a rich source of precise individual health data, and are increasingly used in healthcare research.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to provide an overview of all patient-centred research studies that used fitness trackers.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science databases (up to May 2019) were searched for manuscripts reporting the results of original research using fitness trackers and recruiting patients with any/all medical conditions are included: a total of 63 studies using 41 different models of fitness trackers. Search results were reviewed by two appraisers independently in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Relevant risk-of-bias assessments were performed in all prospective studies.

RESULTS

Study sizes varied, with a median recruitment of 45 patients (IQR 29-147). Twenty-three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified, of which nine recruited patients with metabolic syndrome or associated conditions with the aim of lifestyle modification. The RCTs did not agree in their conclusions regarding the benefit of using fitness trackers for lifestyle modification. In the remaining 40 studies, 6 were prospective case-control studies, and the remainder were a mix of cohort (21), cross-sectional (8), qualitative (3) and retrospective (2) studies. Fitbit was the commonest device manufacturer, with 27 (42.9%) studies using their products.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the exponential rise of fitness trackers being used in healthcare studies over the last five years, which is likely to continue as fitness trackers and smart-watches offer new healthcare features. Studies reported in this review are of variable quality, and more robust studies to examine the place of fitness trackers in healthcare are necessary – and urgently needed – as their potential to provide objective clinical context is undeniable.

CLINICALTRIAL

PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42018098993

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3