Consistency of daily number of reported COVID-19 cases in 191 countries between two major data sources, 2020-2022 (Preprint)

Author:

Liu HanORCID,Zong HuiyingORCID,Yang YangORCID,Schwebel David CORCID,Xie BinORCID,Ning PeishanORCID,Rao ZhenzhenORCID,Li LiORCID,Hu GuoqingORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is among the greatest global public health challenges of this century.The WHO and the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (JHU CSSE) were two open-access data sources which were widely used in research and decision-making about the COVID-19 epidemic.High-quality data is one key aspect of public health crisis and pandemic preparedness for decision-making, practice, and research about prevention and control. To better respond to pandemics and other health crises in the future, it is necessary to evaluate the quality of pandemic data to improve rapid response to outbreaks.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate consistency of daily reported Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in 191 countries from the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (JHU CSSE) and the World Health Organization (WHO) dashboards during 2020-2022.

METHODS

We retrieved data concerning new daily COVID-19 cases in 191 countries covered by both data sources from January 22, 2020, to December 31, 2022. The ratio of numbers of daily reported cases from the two sources were calculated to measure data consistency. We performed simple linear regression to examine significant changes in the ratio of numbers of daily reported cases during the study period.

RESULTS

Of 191 WHO member countries, only 60 displayed excellent data consistency in the number of daily reported COVID-19 cases between the WHO and JHU CSSE dashboards (case number ratio: 0.9-1.1). Data consistency changed greatly across the 191 countries from 2020 to 2022 and differed across four types of countries, defined by income. Data inconsistency between the two data sources generally decreased slightly over time, both for the 191 countries combined and within the four types of income-defined countries. The absolute relative difference between two data sources increased in 84 countries (particularly for Malta, Montenegro, and United States, R2=0.29) but decreased in 40 countries (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The inconsistency between the two data sources warrants further research. Construction of public health surveillance and data collection systems for public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic should be strengthened in the future.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3