Interformat Reliability of Web-Based Parent-Rated Questionnaires for Assessing Neurodevelopmental Disorders Among Preschoolers: Cross-sectional Community Study (Preprint)

Author:

Tanaka MasanoriORCID,Saito ManabuORCID,Takahashi MichioORCID,Adachi MasakiORCID,Nakamura KazuhikoORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection and intervention for neurodevelopmental disorders are effective. Several types of paper questionnaires have been developed to assess these conditions in early childhood; however, the psychometric equivalence between the web-based and the paper versions of these questionnaires is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the interformat reliability of the web-based parent-rated version of the Autism Spectrum Screening Questionnaire (ASSQ), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire 2007 (DCDQ), and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) among Japanese preschoolers in a community developmental health check-up setting.

METHODS

A set of paper-based questionnaires were distributed for voluntary completion to parents of children aged 5 years. The package of the paper format questionnaires included the ASSQ, ADHD-RS, DCDQ, parent-reported SDQ (P-SDQ), and several additional demographic questions. Responses were received from 508 parents of children who agreed to participate in the study. After 3 months, 300 parents, who were among the initial responders, were randomly selected and asked to complete the web-based versions of these questionnaires. A total of 140 parents replied to the web-based format and were included as a final sample in this study.

RESULTS

We obtained the McDonald ω coefficients for both the web-based and paper formats of the ASSQ (web-based: ω=.90; paper: ω=.86), ADHD-RS total and subscales (web-based: ω=.88-.94; paper: ω=.87-.93), DCDQ total and subscales (web-based: ω=.82-.94; paper: ω=.74-.92), and P-SDQ total and subscales (web-based: ω=.55-.81; paper: ω=.52-.80). The intraclass correlation coefficients between the web-based and paper formats were all significant at the 99.9% confidence level: ASSQ (r=0.66, <i>P</i>&lt;.001); ADHD-RS total and subscales (<i>r</i>=0.66-0.74, <i>P</i>&lt;.001); DCDQ total and subscales (<i>r</i>=0.66-0.71, <i>P</i>&lt;.001); P-SDQ Total Difficulties and subscales (<i>r</i>=0.55-0.73, <i>P</i>&lt;.001). There were no significant differences between the web-based and paper formats for total mean score of the ASSQ (<i>P</i>=.76), total (<i>P</i>=.12) and subscale (<i>P</i>=.11-.47) mean scores of DCDQ, and the P-SDQ Total Difficulties mean score (<i>P</i>=.20) and mean subscale scores (<i>P</i>=.28-.79). Although significant differences were found between the web-based and paper formats for mean ADHD-RS scores (total: <i>t</i><sub>132</sub>=2.83, <i>P</i>=.005; Inattention subscale: <i>t</i><sub>133</sub>=2.15, <i>P</i>=.03; Hyperactivity/Impulsivity subscale: <i>t</i><sub>133</sub>=3.21, <i>P</i>=.002), the effect sizes were small (Cohen <i>d</i>=0.18-0.22).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the web-based versions of the ASSQ, ADHD-RS, DCDQ, and P-SDQ were equivalent, with the same level of internal consistency and intrarater reliability as the paper versions, indicating the applicability of the web-based versions of these questionnaires for assessing neurodevelopmental disorders.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3