The Relation Between Students’ Theoretical Knowledge and Practical Skills in Endodontics: Retrospective Analysis (Preprint)

Author:

Haupt FranziskaORCID,Kanzow PhilippORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dental undergraduate students are required to show sufficient practical skills prior to treating patients. Practical skills and the underlying theoretical knowledge are taught in preclinical courses. Usually, the learning outcome is assessed in written multiple-choice examinations (theoretical knowledge) and practical skills tests. However, students’ assessment of practical skills is more time consuming and prone to bias than objective multiple-choice examinations.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the relation between students’ theoretical knowledge and practical skills in endodontics. Furthermore, the predictive validity of a theoretical knowledge assessment on students’ practical skills was assessed.

METHODS

Examination results from all students who participated in the preclinical phantom course in Operative Dentistry (sixth semester of the undergraduate dental curriculum in Germany) between the 2015 summer term and the 2022 summer term were retrospectively evaluated (N=447). The effects of age, sex, previous course participation, and theoretical knowledge on students’ practical skills were assessed, using Pearson correlations, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and a linear regression analysis. Subsequently, students’ theoretical knowledge and practical skills were compared via a Fisher exact test to identify a suitable pass mark for students’ theoretical knowledge that was associated with sufficient practical skills (≥60%).

RESULTS

Students’ theoretical knowledge was significantly associated with practical skills (<i>P</i><sub>adjusted</sub>=.02; <i>r</i>=0.13). By using the current pass mark for theoretical knowledge (ie, 60%), a significant differentiation between insufficient practical skills (&lt;60%) and sufficient practical skills (≥60%) was achieved (<i>P</i>=.02). However, for the discrimination between students with sufficient practical skills and students with insufficient practical skills, an adapted pass mark for theoretical knowledge would be more appropriate. The ideal pass mark amounted to 58% (<i>P</i>=.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Students’ practical skills and theoretical knowledge are significantly correlated. By objectively measuring students’ theoretical knowledge, a rough estimation of students’ practical skills (ie, a differentiation between sufficient and insufficient practical skills) is possible.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3