Conceptualizing and Measuring Social Media Use in Health and Wellbeing Studies: A Systematic Review (Preprint)

Author:

Bekalu MesfinORCID,Sato Taisuke,Viswanath K.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Given the increasing use of social media and the effects of such use on health and well-being, researchers have called for a public health research agenda to guide the design of social media platforms as well as the public’s use of these platforms in ways that improve health and well-being. However, despite an increasing number of studies revealing both the benefits and harms of social media use, there is heterogeneity and lack of consensus in how social media use is conceptualized, defined and measured. Additionally, little is known whether existing literature focuses on negative well-being outcomes or positive wellbeing outcomes, and whether studies use theories.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this study was to systematically review the literature on the association of social media use with health and wellbeing and examine (1) how social media use has been conceptualized and measured, (2) what health and well-being outcomes have been focused on, and (3) whether studies used theories.

METHODS

Relevant studies were located through a comprehensive search strategy involving four steps. First, key word searches were conducted on six major databases: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, EMBASE, ProQuest and Annual Reviews. Second, a search was conducted on Google Scholar using the same sets of search terms and the first 100 results were examined. Third, the reference sections of reviews identified in the first two rounds of searches were examined, and finally, the reference lists of the final set of articles included in the review were searched. Through a multi-stage screening, articles that met our inclusion criteria were included for analysis.

RESULTS

The review included a total of 233 articles published between 2007 and 2020 in 51 different countries. The findings indicated that while 28% of the studies investigated the effects of the problematic use or addiction of social media on health and well-being, 72% studied the effects of social media use as a “normal” behavior. Most of the studies used measures assessing the time users spend using social media. The majority of the studies that examined the effects of problematic social media use or addiction used addiction scales. Most studies studied the association of social media use with mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety, self-esteem, and loneliness. While there is a considerable number of studies investigating physical health outcomes such as self-rated health, sleep, and sitting time or lack of physical activity, relatively a small number of studies studied social, psychological and emotional wellbeing. Most of the studies (79%) did not use any theory.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies conceptualized social media use as a “normal” behavior and mostly used time-spent measures, whereas a considerable number of studies conceptualized social media use as an addiction and used various addiction measures. The studies disproportionately focused on investigating the effects of social media use with negative health and well-being outcomes. The findings suggest the need for going beyond time-spent to more sophisticated measurement approaches that take into account the multiplicity of activities that users perform on social media platforms, and the need for more theory-based studies on the association of social media use with not only negative well-being or “ill-being” but also with positive health and well-being outcomes.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3