Health Outcomes, Attitudes, and Improvements of Synchronous Virtual Consultations for Non-Malignant Chronic Illnesses: A Scoping Review (Preprint)

Author:

Dhunnoo PranavsinghORCID,Kemp BridieORCID,McGuigan KarenORCID,Meskó BertalanORCID,O’Rourke VickyORCID,McCann MichaelORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While virtual consultations have experienced a rise in adoption in recent years, retention remains challenging and aspects around the associated experiences and outcomes remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The need to further investigate those aspects were motivating factors for conducting a scoping review with a focus on synchronous virtual consultations for non-malignant chronic illnesses, and the associated health outcomes, attitudes and potentials for technological improvements.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guided the scoping review process. An inclusion criteria based on the Population, Concept and Context (PCC) framework was designed. A search strategy, informed by the PCC framework, was applied to PubMed (including MEDLINE), CINAHL Complete, APA PsycNet, Web of Science, IEEE and ACM Digital. Screening of articles and data extraction of included articles were performed in parallel and independently by two researchers who corroborated their findings and resolved any conflicts.

RESULTS

4,167 unique articles were identified from the databases searched. Following multi-layer filtration, 19 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and relevant data were extracted from their full texts.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with non-communicable chronic conditions, virtual consultations are generally associated with positive health outcomes that are either directly or indirectly related to their ailment; but sustained improvements remain unclear. These modalities also indicate the potential to empower such patients to better manage their condition. HCPs and patients tend to be satisfied with remote care experience and most are receptive to the modality as an option. Assistance from supplemental technologies mostly reside in addressing technical issues and additional modules could be integrated to address challenges relevant to patients and HCPs. However, positive outcomes and attitudes towards the modality might not apply to all cases, indicating that virtual consultations are more appropriate as options rather than replacements of in-person visits.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3