What goes on in digital behaviour change interventions for weight loss maintenance targeting physical activity: A Scoping Review (Preprint)

Abstract

Behavioural interventions for weight loss maintenance have shown beneficial effects for weight loss maintenance. While the digital upgrade of behavioural interventions brings an enormous potential to tackle public health challenges, there is limited knowledge about the components of these interventions, i.e., its content, delivery and the theoretical approaches.

To identify the core components of digital behaviour change interventions for weight loss maintenance targeting physical activity, in terms of: i) Behaviour Change Techniques; ii) Mechanisms of Action; iii) Modes of Delivery; iv) Dose; and v) Tailoring/Personalisation. In addition, the links between these components were investigated.

A literature search was performed in 5 electronic databases: PubMed; Embase; CINHAL; PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the identified papers and extracted data related with the study characteristics and behaviour change techniques, mechanism of action, mode of delivery, dose, and tailoring, using standardized classifications whenever available (e.g., behaviour change techniques taxonomy).

Seventeen articles reporting eleven original studies were selected. Two studies were protocols, nine studies presented results for weight change and all but one showed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups. Eight studies (73%) provided adequate information on Behaviour Change Techniques. Five studies (45%) provided partial information about how the Behaviour Change Techniques were linked to mechanisms of action, and only one study (0.9%) described these links for all the techniques. Around half of the studies reported the modes through which behaviour change techniques were delivered. Descriptions of dose were present in most studies, but with minimal information. The use of tailoring or personalisation approaches was mentioned in eight studies (73%), but descriptions of what was tailored and how were minimal.

The compilation of information regarding intervention components was difficult due to the lack of information and systematisation in reporting across papers. This is particularly true for the reporting of the links between behaviour change techniques and the other core intervention components. This information is crucial to help us understand in the context of behaviour change interventions what works or does not work, how it works and why.