Methodological issues to analyse real-world longitudinal occupational health data (Preprint)

Author:

Colin Chevalier RémiORCID,Dutheil FrédéricORCID,Dewavrin SamuelORCID,Cornet ThomasORCID,Baker Julien SORCID,Pereira Bruno

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

Ever greater technological advances and democratization of digital tools such as computers and smartphones offer researchers new possibilities to collect large amounts of health data in order to conduct clinical research. Such data, called real-world data (RWD), appears to be a perfect complement to traditional randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and has become more important in health decisions. Due to its longitudinal nature, RWD is subject to well-known methodological issues that can occur when collecting this type of data. In this article, we present the three main methodological problems encountered by researchers, these include, the longitudinal data itself, missing data (not available - NA) and cluster-correlated data. These concepts have been widely discussed in the literature and many methods and solutions have been proposed to cope with these issues. As examples, mixed and trajectory models have been developed to explore longitudinal data sets, imputation methods can resolve NA issues, and multilevel models facilitate treating cluster-correlated data. This article reviews the various solutions proposed and attempts to analyze all three in detail. Although solutions exist to meet these data collection challenges, solutions are not always correctly exploited, especially in cases where data collection issues overlap. In an attempt to solve this problem, we have conceived a process that considers all three issues simultaneously. This process can be divided into two parts: the first part of data management comprises of several phases such as definition of data structure, identification of suspect data and application of imputation methods. The second part of the analysis relates to the application of different models for repeated data using the modified data set. As a result, it should be possible to facilitate work with data sets and provide results with higher confidence levels. To support our proposal, we have used results from the “Wittyfit” database, which is an epidemiological database of occupational health data.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3