“Quo Vadis” Optometry: Understanding the Perspectives of Optometrists and Ophthalmologists in Scotland (Preprint)

Author:

Constantin AuroraORCID,Atkinson Malcolm,Bernabeu Miguel,Buckmaster Fiona,Dhillon Baljean,McTrusty Alice,Strang Niall,Williams RobinORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A repository of ocular images for research is being established. It will provide an infrastructure to allow researchers to conduct approved research validating, tuning and refining AI decision-support algorithms that could potentially be deployed in Scottish optometry and beyond. Research studies all over the world have been successful in demonstrating the potential of AI systems in optometry and ophthalmology. Researchers are investigating how to translate these into medical practice. Widespread adoption of these methods in eyecare has yet to happen.

OBJECTIVE

18 optometrists and 5 ophthalmologists were interviewed to: (1) identify their expectations and concerns about the establishment of the national image research repository and the deployment of AI-decision support tools in practice, as well as; (2) gather their suggestions about how eye healthcare services might be improved by using these digital tools. The main goal was to clarify aspects of primary eye healthcare conducted by optometrists as this is less well studied. A smaller sample of ophthalmologists were interviewed to better understand their working relationships with optometrists and their perceptions regarding a national image research repository and the use of AI-decision support tools.

METHODS

Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted between March and August 2021. They lasted between 30 and 60 minutes and were conducted online, via Teams. The transcribed and pseudonymised recordings (around 15 hours) were analysed using Thematic Analysis using NVivo (March 2020 release).

RESULTS

All the optometrists and ophthalmologists supported ocular image data sharing and were keen to see an extensive and long-running research repository of patients’ images. Our main findings are summarised as follows: 1. Optometrists were willing to share images of their patients' eyes but expressed concern about technical difficulties, lack of standardisation (e.g., in software and instrumentation, in capturing and transferring images) and the effort involved. 2. Optometrists were concerned to retain skills and professional responsibility when judging patients’ conditions if they were assisted by AI-tools. 3. Optometrists and ophthalmologists saw digital infrastructures for sharing ocular images as a means to improve collaboration, e.g., when patients are referred to secondary healthcare or move between optometry practices. 4. An expanded healthcare role of community optometrists in diagnosis and management of ocular diseases coupled with new technologies has significant potential patient health benefits but may be in tension with commercial pressures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our investigation of attitudes focusing on optometrists’ roles in eyecare is novel. The following dominant findings were consistent with studies of ophthalmology and other medical disciplines: • near universally positive attitudes to applying AI and digital tools in biomedical research to improve ocular healthcare. • concerns related to the time spent on training, cost of equipment, but also impact of the use of future digital infrastructure and AI decision-support tools on optometrists’ practices. Our study revealed opportunities and potential innovations not previously foregrounded: • Respondents, particularly optometrists, anticipated transforming service delivery using digital infrastructure and tools. • They also envisaged changes to practice, standards, roles and responsibilities. Attention needs to be given to establishing a supportive professional environment to ensure widespread and sustainable provision of advances in ocular healthcare exploiting concurrently advances in EHR, digital-image handling and analysis. We propose next steps¬ to gather the views of other stakeholders, e.g., patients, technical assistants and healthcare administrators and a wider range of ophthalmologists and optometrists. To facilitate exploitation of emerging digital technology, future work should clarify the issues flagged up and develop with all stakeholders a viable and sustainable path for service innovation.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3