Telehealth Perceptions Among Immigrant Patients (Preprint)

Author:

Levine SusanORCID,Gupta RichaORCID,Alkwatli KendaORCID,Almoushref AllaaORCID,Cherian SairaORCID,Feterman Dominique JimenezORCID,Cordero Baez Greishka NicoleORCID,Hart AngelaORCID,Weinstock ClaraORCID

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

The use of telemedicine has increased dramatically through the COVID-19 pandemic. While data is available about patient satisfaction with healthcare through telemedicine, little is known about the immigrant patient experience. We hypothesized that immigrant patients would prefer live visits as well as have higher ratings for interpersonal communication during live visits over telemedicine. We also expected that other satisfaction category ratings would be similar between immigrant and nonimmigrant patients. Patients seen by four Internal Medicine providers in both a live and telemedicine setting were surveyed. Patients seen via live visits were given a paper copy of the survey at the beginning of the visit and the same survey was administered by follow-up phone call for telemedicine visits. Surveys were administered in English, Spanish or Arabic. The survey consisted of 9 questions on a satisfaction scale of 1-5 assessing satisfaction under the categories of access to care, interpersonal interaction, quality of care and next visit preference. An additional question assessed reasons for next visit type preferences. Survey data were collected from 115 televisits and 108 live visits. These responses came from 60 immigrant and 163 non-immigrant patients. Across both patient populations, satisfaction with access to care, interpersonal interaction, and quality of care was universally high with no significant difference between patient groups. More common reasons for non-immigrants to prefer televisits included convenience. Immigrant patients more often prioritized time with the provider, some citing an advantage of not having to navigate the office and feeling as though they had the provider's undivided attention. Patients in both groups who preferred live visits cited visit quality as a driving factor of visit type selection. While satisfaction was equally high for both telemedicine and live visits across immigrant and non-immigrant populations, differences in patient satisfaction priorities arose and may suggest opportunities to minimize health equity barriers.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3