Protocol of Systematic Review: What is the effectiveness (benefits and harms) of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in intermediate risk countries? - A Systematic Review (Preprint)

Author:

Mourato Maria BeatrizORCID,Pratas NunoORCID,Taré FilipaORCID,Santos GuilhermeORCID,Dinis RuiORCID,Areia MiguelORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric Cancer is the fifth neoplasia with the highest incidence worldwide and the fourth with the highest mortality. Its geographical distribution is not homogeneous: there are high risk areas, intermediate risk areas and low-risk areas. The advanced stage at diagnosis and the aggressiveness of the disease lead to an age-standardized 5-year survival rate of only 20 to 40%. On opposite side, early gastric cancer has an excellent prognosis. Therefore, early detection greatly increases the chances of successful treatment. In intermediate risk countries, several studies have been developed to determine the relevance of screening and how it could be developed. However most Western Societies continue to recommend screen only in selected populations with high-risk factors for gastric cancer. Furthermore, we found that there are no systematic reviews on gastric cancer endoscopic screening in intermediate risk countries.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the effectiveness (benefits and harms) of endoscopic screening for gastric cancer in intermediate risk countries (Helicobacter pylori detection rate; detection rate of pre-cancer lesions; detection rate of early gastric cancer; mortality rate of gastric cancer; 5-year survival rate of gastric cancer;

METHODS

This protocol follow the PRISMA-P recommendations. We will carry out a systematic review of the literature, searching 3 electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web Of Science. To capture additional studies, manual searches will be carried out. The eligibility criteria are: studies performed in humans, whose title or abstract contains the search descriptors in the databases consulted;randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, economic studies; Studies published as a full article, until 2024. Two independent reviewers will screening the title and abstract of all search results. The selected studies will then be fully analyzed and the data will be collected and coded in a database. If possible, a meta-analysis will be carried out.

RESULTS

The author will look for the following outcomes: Intermediate risk countries with established endoscopic screening for gastric cancer; Results of endoscopic screening programs;Cost-effectiveness analysis of endoscopic screening programs for gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review will be conducted with the aim of evaluating the effectiveness of endoscopic gastric cancer screening in intermediate-risk countries. In this way, we believe we will contribute to expanding knowledge in this area and support future decisions to implement endoscopic screening in this type of population.

CLINICALTRIAL

PROSPERO: CRD42024502174

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3