The digital divide: accounting for vulnerable patients in teledermatology research (Preprint)

Author:

Miller John,Ioffreda Patrick,Nugent Shannon,Jones Elizabeth

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-to-provider teledermatology relies on a patient’s access to technology to ensure a successful visit. However, access to broadband internet and technology varies between populations in the United States – leading to the digital divide. While teledermatology has been recognized as a model to improve access, little is known about how often demographic data associated with digital inequity is captured in studies.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize how often demographic data associated with digital inequity is reported in patient-to-provider teledermatology studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using search term teledermatology for the following databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. All studies published between December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2021 that evaluated patient-to-provider teledermatology were eligible.

RESULTS

1412 publications describing teledermatology were identified, of which 46 met the inclusion criteria. Race or ethnicity was the most frequently reported demographic characteristic (61%). However, only 41% of studies were representative of race or ethnicity, defined as including > 20% non-white participants. Studies rarely reported participants greater than 65 years old (30%), preferred language (20%), income (13%), highest level of education (11%), or access to a device (9%). Studies conducted after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic were significantly more likely to report preferred language and appeared more likely to report other demographic data associated with digital inequity without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Demographic data associated with digital inequity is rarely reported in patient-to-provider teledermatology studies to-date. These studies frequently lack adequate representation of racial and ethnic minorities. Demographic data associated with digital inequity should be reported in teledermatology studies to advance inclusive research methodologies and ensure generalizable conclusions.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3