People are different: Exploring anesthesia provider preferences for precision feedback (Preprint)

Author:

Landis-Lewis ZachORCID,Andrews ChrisORCID,Gross ColinORCID,Friedman CharlesORCID,Shah NiravORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In health systems, feedback is pervasive and is widely considered to be essential for learning that drives improvement. Clinical quality dashboards are one widely deployed approach to delivering feedback, but engagement with these systems is commonly low, reflecting a limited understanding of how to improve the effectiveness of feedback about health care. When coaches and facilitators deliver feedback for improving performance, they aim to be responsive to the recipient’s motivations, information needs, and preferences. However, such functionality is largely missing from dashboards and feedback reports. Precision feedback is the delivery of high-value, motivating performance information that is prioritized based on its motivational potential for a specific recipient, including their needs and preferences. Anesthesia care offers a clinical domain with high-quality performance data and an abundance of evidence-based quality metrics.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to explore anesthesia provider preferences for precision feedback.

METHODS

We developed a test set of precision feedback messages with balanced characteristics across 4 performance scenarios. We created an experimental design to expose participants to contrasting message versions and elicited their preferences through analysis of the content of preferred messages. Participants rated their perceived benefit of preferred messages to clinical practice on a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Preferences were diverse across participants, but largely consistent within participants. Ratings of participants’ perceived benefit to clinical practice for preferred messages were high (M=4.27, SD = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Healthcare professionals exhibited diverse yet internally consistent preferences for precision feedback across a set of performance scenarios, while also giving messages high ratings of perceived benefit. A one-size-fits-most approach to performance feedback delivery would not appear to satisfy these preferences. Precision feedback is a theory-informed approach to prioritizing performance information, based on its motivational potential for a specific recipient. We anticipate that precision feedback systems may hold potential to improve the effectiveness of feedback interventions through the satisfaction of diverse and consistent provider preferences for motivating performance information.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3