Barriers and Suggested Solutions to Nursing Participation in Research: A Systematic Review with NLP Tools (Preprint)

Author:

Goldfarb NetaliORCID,Tal NoaORCID,Cohen Idan-ChaimORCID,Elyashar AviadORCID,Ellen Moriah E.ORCID,Rami PuzisORCID,Cohen OdeyaORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare research is pivotal for developing new treatments, improving care quality, and discovering novel treatment methods. Engaging medical staff in research is key to the success of the studies and the staff’s professional development. While physicians often participate in research, nurses are less likely to be involved. The literature outlines barriers to nurses’ involvement in research, such as lack of time and support from colleagues, and suggests solutions like offering advanced career opportunities and stipends to enhance their participation. Organizing the knowledge gained from nurses’ participation in research is essential to more clearly understand the barriers to conducting and implementing research studies.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to systematically identify and analyze barriers that hinder nurses from conducting research and implementing research findings, as well as the solutions suggested to these barriers.

METHODS

: In accordance with Systematic Review Protocols (PRISMA), our systematic review was conducted through a multistep procedure that integrated both manual processing and novel automated natural language processing tools. The initial steps involved conducting a preliminary literature review and performing strategic searches in PubMed, Web of Science, and SCOPUS using selected keywords. We vectorized the documents using Sentence-BERT and TF-IDF, then applied cosine similarity to filter 206 relevant articles from an initial pool of 26,627, guided by the results of the preliminary literature review. We used GPT-4 to identify and categorize barriers and solutions in nursing research, extract study details, and analyze the development of these barriers and solutions over time.

RESULTS

We identified 635 barriers to nursing research across ten categories, notably Education, Organizational Support, and Time Constraints. Furthermore, 489 solutions to these barriers were identified and grouped, focusing on critical improvement areas like Educational Initiatives, Organizational Support, and Evidence-Based Practice Implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing research is crucial for improving health outcomes. Our review identified barriers to nursing research, their suggested solutions, and explored the relationship between these barriers and solutions. Overcoming these barriers can significantly improve research quality and its implementation. Using natural language processing tools is a promising approach for conducting systematic reviews.

CLINICALTRIAL

N\A

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3