Protocol: Methodology for measuring intraoperative blood loss - a scoping review (Preprint)

Author:

Dennin LätitiaORCID,Kleeff JörgORCID,Klose JohannesORCID,Ronellenfitsch UlrichORCID,Rebelo ArturORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND

At present, there is no standardized method for measuring intraoperative blood loss. Rather, the current data on existing methods is very broad and opaque. In many cases, blood loss during surgery is estimated visually by the surgeon. However, it is known that this type of method is very prone to error. Accordingly, better standardized methods are needed.

OBJECTIVE

We are planning to conduct a scoping review with the aim of presenting the currently available methods for measuring intraoperative blood loss. This should help to capture the current status and map and summarize the available evidence for measuring blood loss to identify any gaps.

METHODS

Our review will be based on the PRISMA guidelines. [1] We will search the Pubmed (Medline) and Cochrane Library databases. Studies published in the period from 2012 (01.01.2012) up to and including the end of 2023 (31.12.2023) will be included. Only publications in German and English will be considered. All clinical studies that define "blood loss" as a target criterion or as a primary or secondary endpoint will be included as study types.

RESULTS

The included studies will be listed in a database and the following basic data will be extracted: Title, year of publication, country, language, study type, surgical specialty, type of procedure. The number of participants will be listed and the distribution of the participants will be documented in terms of gender and age. The following outcomes will be extracted: measurement method, "blood loss" as primary or secondary outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, there is no comparable review, resulting in ambiguous data regarding the prevailing measurement methods. The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive overview - from methods of measurement to various formulas for calculating losses - and to establish a status quo. This could then serve as a foundation for further studies.

CLINICALTRIAL

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3