Implementing internet delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety in adults: A mixed-methods systematic review (Preprint)

Author:

Duffy Daniel,Richards Derek,Hisler Garrett,Timulak Ladislav

Abstract

UNSTRUCTURED

A mixed methods systematic review, utilising a convergent synthesis design, was conducted to investigate the implementation of internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) for depression and anxiety in adults. Two domains of inquiry guided this effort, centring on 1) aspects that research articles postulate as important for the implementation of iCBT and 2) aspects relevant to the day-to-day running of iCBT services. Forty (N=40) articles were identified as eligible for mixed-methods review. Data were analysed qualitatively using the descriptive-interpretive approach. The first domain highlighted the impact of therapist and patient attitudes when implementing iCBT, the superiority of guided iCBT over unguided, its non-inferiority to equivalent face-to-face treatments, and its utility outside of the original target of mild-moderate depression and/or anxiety. Three sub-domains were identified under domain two; 1) the management of iCBT in the workplace, detailing the importance of managing the iCBT service, related staff and their motivations around using it 2) the practice of iCBT in the workplace, describing the therapeutic aspects of iCBT provision such as the provision of support, the background of supporters and screening procedures, 3) contextual considerations, detailing the impact of governmental legislation on therapy conduced over the internet, the lack of an iCBT workforce as a limiting factor and the costings associated with iCBT provision. Broadly, the findings describe several aspects that should be taken to account when researchers or practitioners implement iCBT as part of their work. However, the findings should also be interpreted with caution; few of the included studies were conducted with the sole aim of evaluating the implementation of iCBT, highlighting the need for more implementation-specific research in this area.

Publisher

JMIR Publications Inc.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3